Workforce Management

Same-sex spouses of federal employees eligible for benefits

same-sex marriage

Federal employees in legal same-sex marriages will be able to extend insurance benefits, pensions and flexible spending accounts to their spouses and children of spouses as a result of the Supreme Court decision overturning the Defense of Marriage Act.

Federal employees can immediately apply to extend health, life, dental, vision, and long-term care insurance to their same-sex spouses, according to a memo from Elaine Kaplan, acting director of the Office of Personnel Management, to agency heads dated June 28. The window to enroll same-sex spouses for benefits extends to August 26, sixty days from the date of the Supreme Court decision. Retirees have until June 26, 2015, to inform OPM of any change to retirement benefits to provide for a surviving spouse.

Federal employees may have to use paper forms to elect benefits, while online enrollment systems are updated, according to the memo.

The short memo does not dig into many of the myriad jurisdictional questions posed by this extension of benefits. For instance, it's not entirely clear how the decision applies to federal employees who were married in a state where same-sex marriage is recognized, but now reside in a state that does not. The language in the memo, however, suggests an expansive interpretation. It says that OPM will now "be able to extend benefits to federal employees and annuitants who have legally married a spouse of the same sex."

There are about 34,000 federal employees in legally recognized same-sex relationships, including marriages, domestic partnerships, and civil unions, according to a February report of the Congressional Research Service.

About the Author

Adam Mazmanian is a staff writer covering Congress, the FCC and other key agencies. Connect with him on Twitter: @thisismaz.

2014 Rising Star Awards

Help us find the next generation of leaders in federal IT.

Reader comments

Tue, Aug 20, 2013

Not that it's a bad thing, but I've never seen something move so fast as the enactment of this HR process. I mean it seems like the day after the court ruled on it, the President made sure the paint was dry on the canvas. Like I said, I have no problem with it, but I thought it odd that we almost stopped the governement to make sure this was locked-in and implemented. You can tell this is one the President wanted and wanted badly.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above