Workforce

DOD furloughs begin as Pentagon looks to 2014

image of worried man

Defense Department civilian employees have begin taking the long expected -- and feared -- furlough days. (Stock image)

July 8 marked the first day back from a long weekend for many, but for 650,000-plus Defense Department civilian employees, it was the beginning of unwanted time off that will be spread over the next 11 weeks.

Pentagon officials estimate that by having non-military employees take one unpaid day of leave per week through Sept. 30, DOD will save roughly $1.8 billion through the end of the fiscal year. The furloughs are a result of the budget cuts required under sequestration.

The number of furlough days was reduced in May from an estimated 22 days to 11 after Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel determined that the $10 billion from a congressional stop-gap funding measure would be enough to cut down on furlough days.

The furloughs come despite efforts to block them by the Federal Workers Alliance, a group of unions representing 300,000 federal employees.

"Behind every good soldier is a team of dedicated Defense civilian employees," FWA Chairman William Dougan said in a statement released July 1 announcing the alliance's campaign to stop the furloughs. "There is no good reason to send them home for 11 days of unpaid leave when they want to work. These people need to be on the job, not on the couch."

Just days before that, on June 28, DOD issued a memo reminding managers of the steps to take to manage workloads in the absence of civilian employees. Those steps include ensuring that they don't put "borrowed military manpower" to work filling in for missing civilians.

Additionally, "contractors are prohibited from being assigned or permitted to perform additional work or duties to compensate for the workload/productivity loss resulting from the civilian furlough," the memo states.

In the coming days, DOD officials are expected to provide Congress with a detailed analysis of sequestration's effects on the fiscal 2014 budget, the Washington Times reported. Hagel is expected to discuss the budgetary outlook this week.

In two recent public appearances, he touched on the furloughs and the budgetary difficulties that are resulting from sequestration, particularly with regard to the 2014 budget and beyond.

"Furlough is a tough thing, furloughing anybody for any reason. And I want you to know that this is an area that I gave as much attention to as any one thing, as to how do we minimize the downside and the impact on our people?" Hagel said in a June 28 town hall meeting with soldiers at Fort Carson, Colo. "I made the decision after weeks and weeks and weeks of looking at the budget, the numbers of the comptroller and all the leaders...that we could get this done with 11 days of furloughs, maybe better, but you need to be told as directly, clearly and honestly as you can what the facts are. And those are the facts."

In a June 26 press briefing, Hagel said officials are weighing the possibility of continued cuts under sequestration amid fiscal 2014 planning.

"We started out working on the assumption that [the president's 2014 budget] is the underlying budget, that is the underlying number," he said. "We wanted to assess all the options based on what may occur or continue to occur in the interest of preparing this enterprise to do the job that it is charged to do, and that's the security of this country. That means prepare option one: What [does] our budget in the world look like if sequestration continues?"

Central to those deliberations is the Strategic Choices and Management Review, for which Deputy Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter and Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, completed gathering recommendations from the military services at the end of May. The review of budgetary components, responsibilities and priorities based on different scenarios is helping to guide preparations for potential further cuts, Hagel said.

"I'm assessing that now," he said. "All of our uniformed and civilian leadership was involved, top to bottom, which I wanted. We looked at everything. And based on those numbers, based on those assessments, based on those possibilities and different scenarios, then that will inform our leadership as to how we prepare for next year's budget as we present it in early 2014 for 2015. But also in the event that we're going to be living with sequestration, then I can't do anything else, nor can the leadership, but try to get ahead of this and prepare. That's what it's about."

Reader comments

Tue, Jul 23, 2013 J

If the average law obyding citizen managed their finances and out of government control spending like those who have no real leadership and integrity to make the right decisions for its people we would have the IRS line dancers at our door step, vehicles repossessed, and the government taking complete control in brainwashing our children. The means will justify the end of our great society because of the distorted view of what our nation represents. We have a major crisis without any leadership and true problem solvers. As long as politicians inter are interfare with our values, destroy our morals, lie, cheat, and steal our system will be broke within the next few years!

Tue, Jul 23, 2013

This is nothing more than a political stalemate between the two major parties. Yet they give themselves raises. Wake up America! Our government may be the best, but you and I know that corruption has run amuck. As a Civilian employee we have stopped receiving Cost of Living increases for at least the last 3 years, now we have more work and requirements to fulfill yet getting a 20% pay cut for this FY13 alone. Who knows what will happen through the entire 10 year sequester. I'm fed up with the politics involved and how law makers are so clueless as to what they are doing.

Sat, Jul 20, 2013 rick

Make sure you file with the MSPB In block 16 you need to document them bringing in contractors. This will show that furloughs we're not to obtain efficiency. If you put how it's hurting yourself or family, they don't care!

Mon, Jul 15, 2013 Virginia

It would have made much more sense to reduce some purchases under DoD contracts than to reduce people's pay. Contracts can always be modified later. Now you have people who feel betrayed and and unenthused about doing anything for DoD. They will carry this memory with them until retirement...it will result in a permanent reduction in the workforce's productivity.

Sat, Jul 13, 2013

they will never gain my loyalty ever again

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above