Accountability

Senate bill would increase oversight of clearance process

capitol dome

A bipartisan group of senators have introduced legislation that would make it easier to fire federal workers and debar contractors involved in misconduct concerning security clearance investigations, while providing a funding stream for investigations into such misconduct.

The Security Clearance Oversight and Reform Enhancement (SCORE) Act, sponsored by Sens. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), Rob Portman (R-Ohio), and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), arose from a recent Senate hearing at which it was revealed that the firm that conducted the background investigation into NSA leaker Edward Snowden is the target of a federal probe. Additionally, the Office of the Inspector General for the Office of Personnel Management, which is conducting the investigation, has to scrape together funding because it is not allowed access to OPM's revolving fund, into which agencies requiring background checks for employees must pay.

The SCORE Act allows the OPM IG to use money from the revolving fund for audits, investigations and oversight of security clearance process. The bill also permits the firing or debarment of individuals working on clearance investigations if a "preponderance of the evidence," indicates their involvement with fraud, report falsification, failure to review a report, abuse of authority, or impersonating a federal officer in the conduct of a background investigation.

Finally, the bill requires the director of national intelligence to submit guidance to all federal agencies about which positions require an employee to possess a security clearance, and to review those classifications as duties change.

"Recent events force us to take a close look at what the federal government is doing in the name of national security and how well we are protecting classified information," said Tester, who heads the Subcommittee on Federal Programs and the Federal Workforce. "This bill gives investigators the tools they need to hold folks accountable and protect our national security."

The four senators also sent a letter to the Government Accountability Office seeking information on whether the Department of Defense, the Performance and Accountability Council (a counterintelligence group involved in setting standards for vetting federal employees and contractors) and OPM are on the same page when it comes to clearance standards, and to find out if those standards can be harmonized.

The legislators also want GAO to report on whether standards used by investigators are up to date and complete, how the quality of those investigations is tracked, and what sorts of action agencies have taken against employees or contractors for poorly conducted investigations.

About the Author

Adam Mazmanian is FCW's senior staff writer, and covers Congress, health IT and governmentwide IT policy. Connect with him on Twitter: @thisismaz.

The 2015 Federal 100

Meet 100 women and men who are doing great things in federal IT.

Featured

  • Shutterstock image (by venimo): e-learning concept image, digital content and online webinar icons.

    Can MOOCs make the grade for federal training?

    Massive open online courses can offer specialized IT instruction on a flexible schedule and on the cheap. That may not always mesh with government's preference for structure and certification, however.

  • Shutterstock image (by edel): graduation cap and diploma.

    Cybersecurity: 6 schools with the right stuff

    The federal government craves more cybersecurity professionals. These six schools are helping meet that demand.

  • Rick Holgate

    Holgate to depart ATF

    Former ACT president will take a job with Gartner, follow his spouse to Vienna, Austria.

  • Are VA techies slacking off on Yammer?

    A new IG report cites security and productivity concerns associated with employees' use of the popular online collaboration tool.

  • Shutterstock image: digital fingerprint, cyber crime.

    Exclusive: The OPM breach details you haven't seen

    An official timeline of the Office of Personnel Management breach obtained by FCW pinpoints the hackers’ calibrated extraction of data, and the government's step-by-step response.

  • Stephen Warren

    Deputy CIO Warren exits VA

    The onetime acting CIO at Veterans Affairs will be taking over CIO duties at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

  • Shutterstock image: monitoring factors of healthcare.

    DOD awards massive health records contract

    Leidos, Accenture and Cerner pull off an unexpected win of the multi-billion-dollar Defense Healthcare Management System Modernization contract, beating out the presumptive health-records leader.

  • Sweating the OPM data breach -- Illustration by Dragutin Cvijanovic

    Sweating the stolen data

    Millions of background-check records were compromised, OPM now says. Here's the jaw-dropping range of personal data that was exposed.

  • FCW magazine

    Let's talk about Alliant 2

    The General Services Administration is going to great lengths to gather feedback on its IT services GWAC. Will it make for a better acquisition vehicle?

Reader comments

Wed, Jul 17, 2013

Exactly! I'm voting for the candidate who's platform is, I will vote NO, on any new laws that impede liberty and will repeal at least 3 laws for every new one! Each law chips away another piece of our liberty.

Fri, Jul 12, 2013

Here it comes. I believe that people that share classified material (except the President i.e. Jimmy Carter) can be prosecuted. I also believe that companies can already be debared. Why do we need more redundant laws? Is it so Senators can be perceived as actually doing something? Snowden can be prosecuted and federal employees can be terminated. All it takes is a will to do it. If more laws are going to be added then repeal the current laws that don’t seem to work. I will say that I am more likely to vote for a Senator or Congressman that campaigns on blocking so many new laws that one that campaigns on a platform that “I got this law passed and this one, and this one, and this one….”

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above