Administration

White House argues for Syria intervention on microsite

Map of Syrian chemical weapon attacks from the White House microsite

The new White House microsite explaining why the rationale for action against Syria includes this map of reported chemical weapons attacks.

As President Barack Obama stumped for international support for military strikes on Syria at the G20 Summit in Russia, the White House released a dedicated website designed to explain the rationale for action to the American public.

The site launched as Congress debates a resolution authorizing military action in the face of what lawmakers from both parties say is overwhelming opposition coming via constituent phone calls.

The White House site aggregates administration statements on the issue, from a declassified report that lays the blame for an Aug. 21 chemical attack on the Syrian government, to documents such as readouts of calls with foreign leaders that typically don't circulate beyond journalists' in-boxes.

Visitors are invited to "explore this page to learn more about President Obama's response to the Assad regime's use of chemical weapons in Syria and get the latest news from the White House about the situation."

The site does not urge visitors to contact their Member of Congress in support of military strikes. Instead, it stresses that intervention wouldn't involve ground troops, and puts forth the policy goal of deterring other regimes and groups from using chemical weapons in the future.

About the Author

Adam Mazmanian is a staff writer covering Congress, the FCC and other key agencies. Connect with him on Twitter: @thisismaz.

2014 Rising Star Awards

Help us find the next generation of leaders in federal IT.

Reader comments

Fri, Sep 6, 2013

This is the same intelligence community that assured president Bust that Iraq had WMD. And we are now supposed to believe them. Heck maybe they were right all along and these weapons supposedly used recently were the WMD's that were in Iraq till the US intervention in 2003? Who knows, but I would be very wary of their "convincing" evidence. Go very slowly on this.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above