Critical Read

Better metrics needed for security clearance process

broken lock

What: "Personnel Security Clearances: Full Development and Implementation of Metrics Needed to Measure Quality of Process," a new report by the Government Accountability Office.

Why: Cracks in the security clearance system have contributed, at least in part, to recent high-profile incidents that cost lives and are said to have compromised national security: the attacks on the Washington Navy Yard and classified data leaks by Edward Snowden. Although problems with the security clearance process are not new -- GAO made recommendations for improvement back in 2009 -- the national spotlight has renewed the sense of urgency to fix a broken system.

According to GAO, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Office of Personnel Management are revising regulations that determine a position's need to access classified information, the first step in the clearance process. The revision is in response to a recommendation GAO made in 2012, but other recommendations -- including one from 2009 that OPM measure how well its investigative reports comply with federal standards for improving the quality of documentation -- remained unmet as of August.

Verbatim: "The executive branch has developed some metrics to assess quality at different phases of the personnel security clearance process; however, those metrics have not been fully developed and implemented. To promote oversight and positive outcomes, such as maximizing the likelihood that individuals who are security risks will be scrutinized more closely, we have emphasized, since the late 1990s, the need to build and monitor quality throughout the personnel security clearance process. Having assessment tools and performance metrics in place is a critical initial step toward instituting a program to monitor and independently validate the effectiveness and sustainability of corrective measures. However, we have previously reported that executive branch agencies have not fully developed and implemented metrics to measure quality in key aspects of the personnel security clearance process, including: (1) investigative reports; (2) adjudicative files; and (3) the reciprocity of personnel security clearances, which is an agency's acceptance of a background investigation or clearance determination completed by any authorized investigative or adjudicative executive branch agency."

Full Report: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-14-157T

About the Author

Amber Corrin is a former staff writer for FCW and Defense Systems.

Who's Fed 100-worthy?

Nominations are now open for the 2015 Federal 100 awards. Get the details and submit your picks!

Featured

Reader comments

Tue, Nov 5, 2013 RayW

Yes, something has to be done. 13 years ago I had both a Navy and an Industrial clearance. When I went to work for the Air Force (13 years ago), it took four months to get a clearance, and that was only because we were wasting budget and schedule (since I was the only one who knew the information, and was not cleared to know it, go figure) so they put forth an emergency request to get me cleared again to talk about what I knew (from my Navy and Industrial back ground).

I won't waste space with details, but it seems that often some clearances are social/political/correctness motivated, and the system is now so overworked that it can take a year or more to get clearances, especially for those just out of school or not in a favored status.

I know there is a lot of leg work having two acquaintances who are contractors doing that), so without throwing money we no longer have at the issue, sharing is needed. But knowledge is power, and often agencies do not want to share it or use other's information.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above