Management

Initiative aims to find and fix federal inefficiencies

David Walker

Former GAO head David Walker says watchdogs need more authority to "break through the gridlock."

Oversight agencies adept at uncovering government waste and inefficiencies are often better diagnosticians than surgeons – good at pointing out what’s wrong, less effective at actually fixing the problem.

Now the Government Transformation Initiative, a coalition of corporations and nonprofits seeking to improve government operations, is pushing legislation that would create a federal board with the authority not only to assess operational practices within agencies, but provide actionable solutions to Congress and the president.

The Government Transformation Board would be a nonpartisan, transparent group with the authority to oversee the overhaul of government management and operations, with a narrow focus on efficiency and effectiveness. Bipartisan legislation to create the board has been introduced in both chambers. Were the measure to become law, it would have a profound effect on the government’s $82 billion in annual IT spending.

Last year, the Government Accountability Office documented close to $10 billion in failed IT projects and continues to identify hundreds of millions of dollars in duplicative and ineffective IT systems. In most cases, GAO makes recommendations to correct poor processes, but an agency doesn’t have to follow them. According to former U.S. Comptroller General David Walker, a transformation board could add some bite to the GAO’s bark.

“We need something to break through the gridlock: specific actionable recommendations,” said Walker, speaking at GTI-sponsored summit on federal innovation in Washington.

Walker headed GAO from 1998 to 2008, and noted that 85 percent of recommendations made to the executive branch were followed during that time, leading to a $110 return to taxpayers for every dollar spent by GAO. But the agency does not have the manpower to follow up on every recommendation it makes.

“These bills are the beginning, not an end,” Walker said. “The bill in the House has significant bipartisan support. We’re working to get more support in the Senate and I think we’ll get there. We’re not going to get a grand bargain anytime soon – in my view, maybe for three more years – but at least we could put a process in place to try to achieve economy, efficiency and effectiveness in government.”

Former Virginia GOP Rep. Tom Davis, now director of government relations at Deloitte LLP, said the legislation could be a “legacy bill” for either Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), ranking member on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, or Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), the term-limited chairman of  the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Davis said IT – a common duplicative investment across government – doesn’t get the attention it deserves from budget appropriators and lawmakers as a backbone for government operations in the 21st century.

“Unfortunately, the current culture is IT, instead of being an investment, is just a line item in the budget,” Davis said. “We have to get through that whole way of thinking. The idea of a board reporting back is probably the only way it’s going to get done. It’s a great idea, and better than a Hail Mary.”

The 2014 Federal 100

Get to know the 100 women and men honored this year for going above and beyond in federal IT.

Reader comments

Sun, Feb 9, 2014

Walker is a bean counter by training who knows little about technology. During his tenure there, he bungled the upgrading GAO's own computer systems in several major ways. This is about Walker's own self promotion.

Sun, Jan 26, 2014

Do they really want to get rid of Government Inefficiencies? Like having to Play Politics?

Sun, Jan 26, 2014 John weiler United States

The Interop. Clearinghouse and its IT Acquisition Advisory Council (IT-AAC), are delighted to be part of the GTI offerings, ushering in a robust risk based IT investment framework vetted by DOD, GAO and OMB. The real challenge will be overcoming the many rice bowls and cultural resistance to change. David Shedd, Deputy Director of DIA, recently stated at the Federal Intelligence Summit that "bureaucracies will always choose failure over change" recognizing that the lack of accountability or incentives to try anything new in spite of the mounting evidence on the need for sustainable IT Acquisition Reforms. Another data point is the inability of OSD staff to embrace an Agile IT Acquisition Framework in spite of congressional NDAA Section 804 directive to move away from the water fall, weapon systems methods co-developed by FFRDCs over the past 20 years.

Fri, Jan 24, 2014 Bill

The answer is SMALLER government, not government looking after government. There is nothing that forces government to be efficient like competition does in the private sector. Keeping government as small as possible is the only answer.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above