Email

IRS email woes could have roots in creaky technology

Lois Lerner: c-span.

Emails from former director of the IRS Exempt Organizations Unit Lois Lerner, shown here testifying before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, are at the root of a search that has now cost more than $10 million. (Image from C-SPAN hearing coverage)

On the surface it seems improbable: the IRS spends $2.4 billion a year on IT, yet it can't dig up missing emails from a senior employee to the White House, Justice Department and other government agencies.

Republicans in Congress are having a hard time believing that a hard-drive crash destroyed all copies of the messages. The House Ways and Means and Oversight and Government Reform committees have been after a trove of emails from Lois Lerner, former director of the IRS Exempt Organizations Unit. Lerner has declined to testify to Congress about her role in directing IRS scrutiny toward requests from Tea Party-affiliated groups to obtain tax-exempt status, and Republicans investigating the case are keen to probe for links between Lerner's activities at IRS and wider coordination in the Obama administration.

The IRS says it has spent $10 million and 120,000 hours working on recovering Lerner's emails, and the emails of other officials with involvement in the alleged harassment. The effort has necessitated another $6 million to $8 million in associated costs, according to a letter from Leonard Orsler, IRS National Director for Legislative Affairs. Overall, the IRS says it will produce 67,000 emails listing Lerner and others as a sender or recipient, but that emails from January 2009 to April 2011 are unrecoverable.

Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), chairman of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, has issued a subpoena for any backups or other archival material for Lerner's emails, Microsoft Outlook .pst files that might contain stored emails, and any emails and documents Lerner printed and stored to comply with the Federal Records Act.

"Plot lines in Hollywood are more believable than what we are getting from this White House and the IRS," said Rep. Dave Camp (R-Mich.), the Ways and Means chairman.

Politics aside, the IRS has had longstanding problems with both its enterprise and public-facing IT systems over the years. The Government Accountability Office took the IRS Business Systems Modernization program off its high risk list only in 2013. It had been on the list since 1995. And in April, the IRS missed a deadline to upgrade from the retired Windows XP operating system, and is paying Microsoft for out-of-lifecycle support for the aging system.

The IRS is in the midst of migrating employees to Windows 7, but currently only about half the agency's machines have been upgraded, and they are looking to Congress for $30 million to finish the switch.

"We are very concerned that if we don't complete that work, we're going to have an unstable environment in terms of security," IRS Commissioner John Koskinen told an Appropriations subcommittee in April.

The IRS practice during the time of the missing emails had been to allow employees 150 megabytes of email in their active in-boxes -- about 1,800 emails. That has since been upped to 500MB. Employees were required to archive or delete emails once maximum storage was reached. Backups of email servers to tape were done daily, for disaster recovery purposes, but those tapes were destroyed every six months. Last May, the IRS decided to stop destroying backup tapes.

According to the IRS, the hunt for emails is so painstaking and time-consuming because there is no means to search across multiple accounts for emails on the same topic. Once relevant emails are identified, they need to be decrypted and reviewed for taxpayer information and potentially redacted.

Koskinen will be back to testify before Ways and Means on June 20 about the missing emails, and to answer questions about how long the tax agency knew that they were unable to produce materials sought by Congress.

About the Author

Adam Mazmanian is a staff writer covering Congress, the FCC and other key agencies. Connect with him on Twitter: @thisismaz.

Who's Fed 100-worthy?

Nominations are now open for the 2015 Federal 100 awards. Get the details and submit your picks!

Featured

Reader comments

Fri, Jun 20, 2014

It's clear to me that with Ms. Lerner taking the 5th yet declaring her innocence AND the fact that all her e-mail for specifically the period in question, she at least thinks she's guilty of something and took action to cover it up. BUT, her e-mails were either sent to others and/or received from others. Just need to do a wider search of other individuals to put together the pieces. So even if she did manage to destroy her e-mails, there are plenty of smoking guns out there that are yet to be uncovered. Unfortunately, no one is coming forward volunteering e-mails to/from her. They're scared that they too might be guilty of something.

Thu, Jun 19, 2014

The "alleged harassment" has definitely happened as shown by the huge volume of hard evidence - and it is still continuing to happen per on-going documentation. The investigation is to try to determine all of whom are pulling the strings - as we (those who have taken the time to study up on this from multiple sources) already know that the harassment has occurred. Considering the amount of backups in the systems as well as the fact that these emails went to multiple sources outside the IRS, that also have backups, you have to be a fool to believe that these emails were lost due to a "computer crash". Considering what has been supposedly spent by the IRS on this investigation, one has to wonder how much of that activity and money is being diverted to the cover up.

Thu, Jun 19, 2014

Along with investigating the IRS, they should investigate Congress, Senate, GSA and all those agencies that think they are above the law. To much finger pointing and not enough doing and taking care of business.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above