Congress

Bipartisan IT procurement overhaul bill unveiled

Shutterstock image.

A bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced a bill July 30 that would restructure federal IT procurement by, among other things, establishing a pilot program in the Office of Management and Budget to review select projects for cost overruns.

The bill would replace the Office of Electronic Government with the U.S. Digital Government Office, headed by a “strengthened” federal chief information officer, a bill summary said.

The bill is sponsored by Silicon Valley Democrat Anna Eshoo, and cosponsored by Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), Richard Hanna (R-N.Y.) and Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.). It is dubbed the Reforming Federal Procurement of Information Technology Act.

“A recent study found that 94 percent of major government IT projects between 2003 and 2012 came in over budget, behind schedule, or failed completely,” Eshoo said in a statement. “In an $80 billion sector of our federal budget, this is an unacceptable waste of taxpayer dollars.”

She said the botched rollout of HealthCare.gov called for shaking up the procurement system.

The bill’s pilot program would last three years and cover at least one project from each of five agencies: OMB, the departments of Homeland Security and Veteran Affairs, the General Services Administration and the Small Business Administration.

A draft of the bill released in January would have given the Digital Government Office broader scope to review projects, but “a lot of the vendors were concerned that that would just sort of gum up the process even further, having stuff go to the White House to just sort of enter a black hole, never to return,” said a congressional aide familiar with the legislation. The new version starts with a narrower pilot program.

The bill is a welcome effort to improve communication between government and IT vendors throughout the acquisition process, said Trey Hodgkins, senior vice president at the IT Alliance for Public Sector.

“Once those small businesses see the daunting red tape and the mountain of government-unique requirements they have to face to do business in the federal government, most of them, we find, shy away,” he said in an interview. “And so there are some attempts [in the bill] to try to change that dynamic.”

But the bill does not address industry concerns about stringent statutory requirements that give agencies the technical rights to commercial IT products and services, Hodgkins said. Leaving that unaddressed means it is “unclear if [the bill] is enough of an incentive to now entice” previously skittish firms to bid for federal contracts.

The measure would also:

  • Raise the simplified acquisition threshold to $500,000 for information technology services provided by certain small technology firms.
  • Codify the Presidential Innovation Fellows program.
  • Require GSA to provide Congress with recommendations on how to streamline IT Schedule 70.

About the Author

Sean Lyngaas is a staff writer covering defense, cybersecurity and intelligence issues. Connect with him on Twitter: @snlyngaas.

Who's Fed 100-worthy?

Nominations are now open for the 2015 Federal 100 awards. Get the details and submit your picks!

Featured

Reader comments

Fri, Aug 1, 2014 John weiler United States

Al, no, as it does not address FFRDC mis-use. What is not known is that FAR prohibition on using FFRDCs like Mitre to do commercial work are being ignored. Mitre had received a 1BILLION contract to developed the acquisition strategy, architecture and security testing. By competing with industry, they undermine any agency efforts to embrace COTS and Commercial Best Practices. Same failure patterns can be seen with the failed DCGS-A, DHS SBInet, FBI Virtual Case File, DISA Cloud, DISA NECC, NGA GEOSCOUT, and IRS Modernization project. Collectively, Mitre has contributed to nearly $100B in IT program failures since its began its efforts to coop the entire federal IT market.

Fri, Aug 1, 2014 John weiler United States

This bill attempts to implement IT-Acquisition Advisory Council's highly regarded Congressional Roadmap for Sustainable IT Acquisition Reform, which was just updated; http://www.it-aac.org/itreformroadmap.html

Thu, Jul 31, 2014 Al

Had this bill been passed a few years ago, would Healthcare.gov have worked correctly? No? Okay- moving on . . .

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above