What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

    FCW Insider

    Blog archive

    FCW Insider: A question worth asking


    I was going through my RSS feeds today and was reading Harvard Business School Associate Prof. Andrew McAfee's blog. (McAfee has become a CJD fav. He specializes in the merger of the enterprise and technology, and he is credited with creating the term Enterprise 2.0. FCW profiled McAfee last year and last week we featured his blog as one of the five blogs worth reading. McAfee is one of the keynote speakers at 1105 GovInfo's Government Leadership Summit beginning Sunday. And -- shameless plug -- if you want to attend, let me know. I also mentioned earlier that McAfee will be out guest on the June 2 FCW radio show, which airs on DC's Federal News Radio.)

    Anyway, McAfee has posted today about a group that is going to be looking at the "grand challenges" for 21st century management. As part of that, they have one of the best worded questions that I've heard in awhile. Here is an excerpt of McAfee's blog post, headlined What I Said About the Revolution:


    Later this week, the Management Lab is convening a group of academics and practitioners to "to define the “Grand Challenges” for 21st century management, and imagine possible solutions to them." The list of attendees is very impressive; I’m flattered to have been asked to participate and anticipate learning a lot.

    As part of the preparation for the conference we we asked to "Briefly describe a “design flaw” or “impediment” that undermines the capacity of organizations to adapt, innovate, or fully engage the talents of their members." We were then asked to "Briefly describe a “radical remedy” that might help to counter or avoid the impediment or design flaw described above."


    Read more.

    McAfee then blogs about his responses, which are interesting in their own right.

    We actually will have a wiki at the Summit where we will tap into the thoughts of the people there, and I'll report back.

    But we also want to ask you -- how would you answer this question for the government? What is the design flaw or impediment? And what is the radical remedy?

    Posted by Christopher J. Dorobek on May 27, 2008 at 9:17 AM


    Reader comments

    Wed, May 28, 2008 Owen Ambur

    One of the Grand Challenges facing government is that it runs on politics rather than performance ... and the powers-that-be prefer as much, because it serves their interests. However, that is not the primary point I'd like to make, which is that even to the degree that rhetoric is spewed about performance management and "strategic alignment," rarely are such concepts effectively applied. Thus, the grand challenge is to make those concepts "real" rather than merely rhetorical. Hopefully, Strategy Markup Language (StratML) will make a contribution toward that end. For more information on StratML, see http://xml.gov/stratml/index.htm & http://www.aiim.org/standards.asp?ID=34121

    Wed, May 28, 2008 don green

    The Flaw: A personnel system that offers no reward for risk, therby guaranteeing that the answer to every question is "NO". "Yes" could get you in trouble if you don't use good judgement. "No" protects the status quo...it's safe.

    Wed, May 28, 2008 John Sikking

    I believe one of the most damaging design flaws in the Federal Government is the inability of Agencies / Departments or Programs to retain or return funds at the end of the fiscal without having their budget shrink by that amount in the following year. For example if I am a Government PM and I have a $5M surplus at the end of the fiscal year and I return this "savings" to the Treasury or Department, etc. My budget will be reduced by $5M the following year. This encourages frantic end of the year spending and the continuation of projects better off killed or delayed. A common case in point, computer hardware is purchased at the end of the Government's fiscal year that will not be used until the middle of the next year or funds are added to an additional contract year (regardless of contractor performance) to "protect" the Agency, Department or Program's budget.

    Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

    Your Name:(optional)
    Your Email:(optional)
    Your Location:(optional)
    Comment:
    Please type the letters/numbers you see above

    Related Articles

    Nick Wakeman

    FCW Insider

    eSeminar

    • Technology success through the stimulus Karen Jackson

      FCW will present Karen Jackson, deputy secretary of technology for the Commonwealth of Virginia, at 11 a.m. Wed, Dec. 9, in an eSeminar where she will discuss technology acquisition through the stimulus. Read more

    Federal Computer Week eNewsletters

    • Subscribe to Newsletters Subscribe

      Federal Computer Week's eNewsletters deliver the latest policy and management news to your inbox.

    Current issue of FCW