What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

FCW Insider

Blog archive

Information Age requires new breed of federal supervisors

By 2014 one-half of the permanent, full-time federal workforce will be eligible to retire—and many are already retiring. The majority of those retirees will be supervisors, according to a new report prepared by the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB).

Because supervisors tend to be older and have more years of service, MSPB researchers believe supervisors are likely to retire at faster rates than other federal employees. And they will leave big holes, if not shoes, to fill.

In the report, titled “As Supervisors Retire: An Opportunity to Reshape Organizations,”  MSPB sees potential in this workforce change. The report discusses how the next generation of supervisors will have to demonstrate a different set of competencies than may have been needed in the past.

The way work is accomplished and the nature of supervision has become more complex in the Information Age. More federal jobs are becoming knowledge-based, and information technology workers are among the critical knowledge workers.

According to the MSPB, this changes what supervisors should be doing and calls for different duties, skills, training, and recruitment strategies. A knowledge-based workforce requires greater supervisory flexibilities, such as telework, and improved supervisory communication.

The report recommends that agencies use the retirement wave as an impetus to recruit supervisors capable of managing a modern workplace. For example, competency in supervising independent, educated and internally motivated workers should be assessed when selecting supervisors.

But the report concludes that, in order to engage employees, supervisors must also have strong management support and the time to devote to supervision.

Posted by John S. Monroe on Dec 02, 2009 at 1:28 PM


Reader comments

Thu, Dec 3, 2009

I am fairly new as a federal supervisor. I came from private sector and pride my self on being up to date on tech. The biggest problem I see is the old timers who have no people skills. It destroys moral and has taken me a year to reverse the past mentality.

Thu, Dec 3, 2009 FedSup DC

I agree, but a lot has to change and not just a few retirements. There are very few of us that truly embrace the knowledge worker and the quality of life workforce. I base my opinion of telework on the data that proves it is more productive, but it is a hard sell to the senior leaders. Even though I believe this and try to practice the information\knowledge age mentality, I am out numbered and criticized for my efforts. Another issue...supervisors are rarely criticized if failing to take care of the employees, but are certainly unsuccessful in their career when not agreeing with the boss.

Thu, Dec 3, 2009 Nelson NY

Good riddance! About time some of these dinosaur "managers" left.

Thu, Dec 3, 2009

I'm a manager with 31 years of government experience who also served as a manager/supervisor in private enterprise. A vast difference that was stark when I moved into a governmental supervisory position 2 years after joining the Fed. People skills are really essential at this level in dealing up and down the line as a GS 15.I am committed to the mission and the people we serve. That's why I stay past retirement. However, with all of the Mickey Mouse with a new administration (and its novices) retirement looks attractive. I would endorse the view that technical skills along with people skills are needed more than ever as a matching set for a federal manager.

Thu, Dec 3, 2009

Thank you, thank you, for bringing up this issue!! My agency is still functioning in a style my Mother terms "1945 factory overseer." Sadly there is an almost adverserial tinge to the interactions between 'managers' and the rest of us (which at my agency, includes many medical doctors, PhDs, Master's etc)--and not because 'we workers' want that. Reading your article made me realize that some of the longer-term (older-style) managers have kind of drawn an 'us against them' line on the floor as they have found themselves increasingly surrounded by well-educated, experienced employees who often possess more technical and content knowledge. Sadly, what they don't realize is most of us are perfectly fine with a manager who may not know what we know, but is good to people, fair, and who doesn't feel the need to dismiss others' accomplishments to feel important themselves. It also helps if the organization provides healthy incentives to ensure truly good managers are rewarded vs. managers feeling the need to imply that the only reason anything is being accomplished is because they personally have coerced and intimidated 'workers' to get into line. Really, if someone has gone thru med school or successfully defended a dissertation, they may occasionally present challenges, but they probably do not have to be 'forced' to achieve.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Editorial Webcasts

  • Service Consolidation: How to Avoid Basic Pitfalls of Shared Services Register Now

    This is the first webcast of the Series “Future First: Three Steps to Data Center Transformation”. Plan to attend this webcast to support your agency efforts to design a practical roadmap for consolidation of resources and shared services to meet current and emerging program demands. Learn from those who are doing to help you evaluate services in your current operations that may lend themselves to future shared service arrangements. Read more

Federal Computer Week eNewsletters

  • Subscribe to Newsletters Subscribe

    Federal Computer Week's eNewsletters deliver the latest policy and management news to your inbox.