'May you live in interesting times' is often said as a curse. But sometimes, 'interesting times' present opportunities as well as challenges. This particular moment appears to be one of those.
"May you live in interesting times" is often said as a curse. But sometimes,
"interesting times" present opportunities as well as challenges. This particular
moment appears to be one of those.
As the work of government officials (executive and legislative), public-interest
groups, academics and the business community begins to bear fruit, serious
consideration is being given to what "transformed" government in the Digital
Age should entail.
Examples of this can be found in the e-government initiative of Sens.
Joseph Lieberman (D-Conn.) and Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.), in the discussions
of whether there is a need for a governmentwide chief information officer,
in the discussions about FirstGov, and in two reports, one just released
and one under way.
The first, from the President's Information Technology Advisory Committee's
Panel on Transforming Government, is most timely. Some key findings of the
report come as no surprise: Major technological barriers prevent citizens
from easily accessing government information resources vital to their well-being;
government information is often unavailable, inadequate, out-of-date and
needlessly complicated; budget planning processes make it difficult to carry
out effective cross-agency coordination and execution and the long-term
research efforts that many of the goals require; and stovepiping of congressional
and executive review processes results in the stovepiping of plans and programs.
The ability to work across agencies is critical to any possibility of
a transformed government. The panel notes what some in the public-interest
community have argued for years — information in the government's many databases
is difficult to find and interpret.
To address the problem, the panel's recommendations include research
on data integration — itself a multilevel problem — and on scalable information
infrastructure. Recognizing FirstGov as a "near-term effort built with currently
available technologies," the panel also urges efforts focused on "government-specific
capabilities," such as "transaction support, metadata creation and comprehensive
searchable catalogs of information and services."
The second report, due out later this fall, results from a study requested
by the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee. The request
includes looking at "modernizing organization structures and functions to
reflect greater emphasis on information planning, management and control
capabilities and the need to consolidate, streamline and simplify missions
The work on this study is being undertaken under the auspices of the National
Commission on Libraries and Information Science.
The Transforming Government report's findings and recommendations should
provide fruit for the NCLIS study to explore what needs to be done to strengthen
access to federal government information over its entire life cycle and
"other key components of the overall federal information dissemination infrastructure."
—McDermott is an information policy analyst with OMB Watch, a government
watchdog group in Washington, D.C.
NEXT STORY: Drive IT with dollars, not dictates