Running to stand still

Telecom managers in companies and agencies are struggling to adjust to shifting Networx timelines

The recent decision to delay the award of the Networx contracts until 2007 did not come as a great shock to companies and agencies that had been tracking the General Services Administration’s progress on the contract.

But the shift in timing — almost a year — doesn’t mean that agencies can relax their preparations for making the transition to Networx, according to telecommunications professionals from companies, agencies and consulting firms. Observers agree that the additional time means preparation can be less frantic, but not that it should be set aside for a while.

GSA now plans to award Networx Universal in March 2007 and Networx Enterprise in May 2007. The earlier target dates had been July 2006 for Universal and September 2006 for Enterprise. Networx Universal will provide a broad range of common services, while Enterprise will cover a narrower selection of more localized offerings.

“We could support the agencies in other ways during this time,” said Tony D’Agata, vice president and general manager of Sprint’s Government Services Division. “We can help them with their inventories, we can help them develop their technology road map. It’s perhaps a more organized pace than might have existed before.”

“Many of the agencies were off to a late start, and the delay will be welcome,” said Warren Suss, president of Suss Consulting. “Other agencies have been active upgrading their networks all along. For those agencies there probably won’t be much effect.”

Transition means different things to different agencies. Depending on which companies finally win the multiple-award contracts, some organizations might not switch providers. They will still have to make some changes, but their transitions will be less demanding than those agencies that change providers, whether by choice or necessity.

Take stock
The most crucial task agencies should be performing now is an inventory of their current communications services and equipment.

“The number and type of things that can be procured from the GSA [on Networx] are much more complex than in the past,” said Fred Knops, a vice president at Booz Allen Hamilton. “The closer you get to an accurate inventory, then the better it will be for transition. Services tend to disappear if you don’t have this inventory. It’s not a matter of just handing a bill to a new provider.”

The Social Security Administration is an agency that has been ahead of the curve in maintaining an inventory, according to SSA officials.

“We actually did an inventory of every circuit that we had,” said Phil Becker, associate commissioner of SSA’s National Computer Center. “We’re maintaining those tables.” The agency will continue to gather information to update the inventory until it is needed. MCI and AT&T both serve the agency.

Suss said even agencies that have done a good job so far cannot afford to relax. Inventory is “not just for getting a handle on what circuits they have but also what those circuits support and are used for,” he said.

That is especially necessary if the agency is moving a network from older technologies to IP, because “the network will have a whole new set of characteristics and traffic it didn’t have before,” he said.

“It’s not something you can do in a day or two,” said Hank Beebe, Networx capture executive for AT&T Government Services. “I would certainly hope that the agencies have this well under way. It takes a substantial amount of time, not just to get the inventory but to make sure they’ve got it correct.”

The carriers also need to be concerned with inventories, said Tony DeJohn, Networx transition executive at AT&T. When agencies change providers, the incoming carrier needs to get the inventory and immediately analyze it to determine whether there are any gaps between what the agency needs and what the carrier can provide.

Draw a map
Once agencies know what they have, they need to decide where they want to go. The change of contract vehicles is a good time to jettison services that agencies no longer need, upgrade technologies for remaining services and consider adding new services.

“A lot of agencies have older technologies,” D’Agata said. “The tendency right now is for agencies to move to an IP environment. It’s a good opportunity for agencies to solidify their technology road map.”

The question of whether to upgrade is not always a simple matter of technology, Suss said. For example, agencies considering switching to voice over IP, thereby converging voice and data services, must consider the ramifications.

“There are a lot of decisions around VOIP that go beyond the technology,” he said. “There are a lot of agencies that have different organizations to manage the voice and the data services, and the funding comes out of different streams. A more important consideration is that the prices for voice services are [already] so low that there’s not a tremendous amount of incentive to integrate voice and data in many cases.”

A few other agencies have pressing needs and will have to decide whether to use FTS 2001 — the current contract that Networx will follow — or find another vehicle to meet their needs, Suss said. The Networx delay may make Treasury Department officials seem prescient for choosing to forge ahead with its Treasury Communications Enterprise contract rather than waiting for Networx, he said.

However, Frank Dzubeck, president of Communications Network Architects, advised agencies to use caution and avoid turning to FTS 2001 for new initiatives. Although elements of FTS 2001 might correlate to what agencies would get from Networx, they won’t necessarily get the services in the same way Networx will eventually provide them, he said.

Sweat the details
Agencies should also be thinking about practical project management matters as the transition to Networx nears. Although the actual projects won’t be under way until several months later than initially expected, it is not too soon to plan for them.

Experience can be a harsh teacher, but a good one, Beebe said.

“We know how to do it wrong,” he said of AT&T. “We managed to leave some unhappy customers transitioning to FTS 2001 from FTS 2000.”

That transition was difficult governmentwide, but Beebe said AT&T expects the upcoming change to go more smoothly, partly because the company learned important lessons from that experience.

“We are more focused on the customer than we were then,” Beebe said. “This idea of taking the high road and acting as an appropriate corporate citizen is more pervasive an attitude around AT&T than maybe it was then.”

The path to NetworxThe history of the General Services Administration’s telecommunications contracts takes on a near-epic sweep when viewed as a whole. From the initial award of FTS 2000 to AT&T and Sprint in 1988 to that contract’s replacement by FTS 2001, awarded to Sprint and MCI in 1998 and 1999, and now the impending award of Networx, the agency has learned from mistakes, seen what works and planned its future by drawing from the lessons of its past.

Networx is actually two multiple-award contracts to be awarded in 2007. The program will emerge in a new era dominated by the demand for managed network services, wireless access and IP-based applications. Procurement practices and industry dynamics have evolved, too. Networx will give federal users more than 50 offerings — everything from old-fashioned toll-free long-distance lines to turnkey voice-over-IP solutions.

Although it will be infused with new products and services and will hold sway in a distant future — the program expires in 2016 — Networx unmistakably reflects its heritage. Like FTS 2001 and the long-extinct FTS 2000, Networx will be positioned as the contract agencies must consider first when buying telecom services. That will be a disadvantage for vendors that don’t get a spot on it and a boon to those that do.

1984: Antitrust litigation leads to breakup of Bell System. AT&T had been the government’s only telephone service provider before the breakup.

1988: General Services Administration awards FTS 2000 to AT&T and Sprint. Contract covers local and long-distance telephone voice service and limited data services.

1995: GSA merges its local and long-distance service organizations to create the Federal Telecommunications Service, later called the Federal Technology Service.

1996: Telecommunications Act of 1996 ends restrictions on Bell companies entering long-distance market.

1998-99: FTS 2001 awarded to Sprint and WorldCom (later called MCI and now merged with Verizon). As successor to FTS 2000, contract features new services, including some data and network services, in addition to voice. Contract also eliminates mandatory-use provision of FTS 2000, allowing agencies to consider other means of procuring services.

2004: GSA issues request for proposals for Networx, the successor to FTS 2001.

2005-06: Verizon and MCI finalize their merger, as do SBC and AT&T. Planned Networx award dates pushed to 2007.

Sources: Suss Consulting, Wikipedia, General Services Administration.

NEXT STORY: Energy launches megasearch effort

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.