Full disclosure

If you were fired or disciplined by your agency, would you know the appeal

options should you decide the action taken against you was unfair?

Because many people do not, the Merit Systems Protection Board has

proposed changes that would require agencies to spell out federal employees'

choices — and the implications of those choices — if an employee decides

to appeal an agency personnel action.

What are the consequences if an employee files a grievance with an agency,

the MSPB or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission? And in some cases,

those organizations aren't the only options. For example, many federal employees

who can appeal to the MSPB also may have the right to pursue the matter

under a statutory or a negotiated grievance procedure under a collective

bargaining agreement.

Most executive branch agencies and their employees are subject to the

Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute. When an executive branch

worker faces a matter that normally may be appealed to the MSPB and is covered

by the negotiated grievance procedure of a collective bargaining agreement,

the worker may be limited to challenging the matter through the grievance

procedure. However, there are certain exceptions, and this is where having

better information will help employees:

* If the employee is challenging an action based on unacceptable performance,

she can appeal to the MSPB or file a grievance — but cannot do both.

* If the employee claims discrimination, she may appeal to the MSPB

or the EEOC or file a grievance — but not both.

* If the employee claims that an action was based on a prohibited personnel

practice other than discrimination, she may appeal to the MSPB, file a prohibited

personnel practice complaint with the Office of Special Counsel or file

a grievance — but may choose only one of those procedures.

I have commented frequently on situations where employees did not take

the right steps to protect themselves because they were not aware of all

their options. The MSPB's proposed changes are a positive step. Employees

should be aware of their appeal rights, and this rule change will ensure

that they are.

The proposed changes are intended to ensure, for example, that employees

understand the consequences of making a choice between the MSPB appeal procedure

and the grievance procedure. Filing an MSPB appeal often is not the best

way to proceed.

It also is intended to ensure that, where employees may pursue both procedures

(as in the case of certain U.S. Postal Service employees), they understand

that the MSPB will not modify or extend its time limit for filing an appeal

if the employees choose to file a grievance first.

In other words, an employee who decides to file an agency grievance

instead of an MSPB appeal must understand the timetable. The employee runs

the risk of not having time to file an appeal with the MSPB if the grievance

ends unsuccessfully. The employee should know that upfront.


  • Management
    shutterstock image By enzozo; photo ID: 319763930

    Where does the TMF Board go from here?

    With a $1 billion cash infusion, relaxed repayment guidelines and a surge in proposals from federal agencies, questions have been raised about whether the board overseeing the Technology Modernization Fund has been scaled to cope with its newfound popularity.

  • IT Modernization
    shutterstock image By enzozo; photo ID: 319763930

    OMB provides key guidance for TMF proposals amid surge in submissions

    Deputy Federal CIO Maria Roat details what makes for a winning Technology Modernization Fund proposal as agencies continue to submit major IT projects for potential funding.

Stay Connected