Scrutinizing MCI

MCI should not be drummed out of the federal market. Perhaps it is in the federal government's best interest to suspend MCI, given the parent company's alleged accounting fraud and subsequent financial troubles. But it is too early to make that call.

Clearly, though, the pressure on the General Services Administration is building. Earlier this month, an official in GSA's inspector general's office asked agency officials to take a closer look at MCI. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) has done the same.

GSA has countered that MCI, a contractor on the FTS 2001 telecommunications program, continues to provide good service — not only meeting but beating contract requirements. Why throw out a contractor that's performing as required?, GSA officials argue.

It's not a unique situation in the federal market. The federal division of a large corporation is often a world unto itself, having a strong management team and meeting its revenue goals while other divisions fall short.

Still, the perceived disconnect between federal and corporate offices can, and should, only go so far. A critical question in this case is whether the government was a victim, in any way, of the parent company's accounting practices. Collins rightly asserts that GSA should investigate that possibility.

A more difficult call is whether MCI's federal customers are at risk of losing vital services because of the company's financial problems. Eventually, the company could find itself unable to invest in the technology and staff needed to maintain a high level of service.

GSA has an obligation to weigh these concerns, and this obligation should not be derailed by Washington politics. Clearly, other telecommunications vendors have a vested interest in seeing MCI suspended, and they are likely to make their case against MCI through whatever channels are available to them.

Agency officials would do MCI's federal customers a disservice if they let politics force their hand. Ultimately, it is in the government's best interests to make a decision based on sound analysis, not in reaction to political pressures.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group