DARPA's filter

Programming and politics are often a poor mix, as the Defense Department's research agency is learning the hard way.

Late last month, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency killed a homeland security-related program after a wave of bad publicity. The program, known as Futures Markets Applied to Prediction, was intended to harness the distributed intelligence of financial speculators to gauge the likelihood of terrorist attacks.

DARPA, of course, is also the force behind the controversial Terrorism Information Awareness program (formerly the Total Information Awareness program), which would sift through various public databases in hopes of identifying individuals who threaten national security.

In some ways, the two projects are typical of DARPA's work. The agency often investigates radical ideas for the Pentagon, and they are always on the lookout for that quantum leap in defense operations. Imagine filling a room with the smartest engineers in the nation and asking them to invent an automobile that runs on solar power without any drop in performance. That's DARPA.

But what if that team of engineers actually came up with such a model, the only catch being that any accident would be certain to result in fatalities? Such a proposal, though technically feasible, would likely be deemed a failure.

Advanced research, by its very nature, produces more failures than successes. The only time this becomes a problem, though, is when those failures see the light of day.

DARPA's mission sometimes requires its engineers to consider the most unlikely solutions to a given problem. But somewhere along the line, someone in that organization must provide a reality check and filter out those ideas that are politically untenable before they enter the public realm.

Without an adequate filter, the agency is simply inviting congressional scru—tiny. Perhaps some scrutiny is required. But it would be unfortunate for DARPA — and for DOD — if political pressures put artificial constraints on the agency's intellectual firepower.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group