DARPA's filter

Programming and politics are often a poor mix, as the Defense Department's research agency is learning the hard way.

Late last month, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency killed a homeland security-related program after a wave of bad publicity. The program, known as Futures Markets Applied to Prediction, was intended to harness the distributed intelligence of financial speculators to gauge the likelihood of terrorist attacks.

DARPA, of course, is also the force behind the controversial Terrorism Information Awareness program (formerly the Total Information Awareness program), which would sift through various public databases in hopes of identifying individuals who threaten national security.

In some ways, the two projects are typical of DARPA's work. The agency often investigates radical ideas for the Pentagon, and they are always on the lookout for that quantum leap in defense operations. Imagine filling a room with the smartest engineers in the nation and asking them to invent an automobile that runs on solar power without any drop in performance. That's DARPA.

But what if that team of engineers actually came up with such a model, the only catch being that any accident would be certain to result in fatalities? Such a proposal, though technically feasible, would likely be deemed a failure.

Advanced research, by its very nature, produces more failures than successes. The only time this becomes a problem, though, is when those failures see the light of day.

DARPA's mission sometimes requires its engineers to consider the most unlikely solutions to a given problem. But somewhere along the line, someone in that organization must provide a reality check and filter out those ideas that are politically untenable before they enter the public realm.

Without an adequate filter, the agency is simply inviting congressional scru—tiny. Perhaps some scrutiny is required. But it would be unfortunate for DARPA — and for DOD — if political pressures put artificial constraints on the agency's intellectual firepower.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.