Finding a balance

Whenever one discusses privacy issues, it is important to begin with a truism that has become cliche: The Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks changed this country's outlook on nearly every issue.

If you have waited in line at airport security checkpoints, for example, no doubt you have a clear understanding of how the landscape has changed.

Few issues, however, have been altered as significantly as the concerns about personal privacy.

There has always been a conflict between privacy and security, and that balance changed dramatically after Sept. 11. But citizens are becoming wary. At least two systems have made that philosophical debate very real — the Transportation Security Administration's Computer Assisted Passenger Prescreening System system and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency's Terrorism Information Awareness program.

It is clear that the Bush administration is sensitive about even the slightest accusation that it is not cognizant of privacy issues.

Administration officials recently attacked the General Accounting Office for suggesting that agencies were not complying with the Privacy Act. In fact, two senior administration officials shot back an unusually detailed response that GAO's conclusions lacked factual basis.

Yet there is a sense that the administration is not concerned with balancing the two issues. For example, officials have decided not to appoint a chief privacy advocate at the Office of Management and Budget.

Unfortunately, few agencies have people watching the security/privacy balance. According to the Center for Democracy and Technology, only three agencies have designated privacy officers — the Homeland Security Department (the only one required by law), the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Postal Service.

An easy way to strike a balance between privacy and security would be to have agencies — including OMB — appoint privacy officers who can help ensure that such issues are considered.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.