Managing expectations

Ten years from now, will we look back and remember the dot-gov bubble?

The forces of supply and demand are creating a volatile and potentially dangerous mix in today's federal technology marketplace.

On the demand side, federal technology budgets are on a strong growth path. The spending is fueled by citizen demand for e-government, mission requirements to integrate and present real-time information for greater national security, and a management agenda with teeth that drives outsourcing. Continued double-digit growth in federal information technology spending has become the expectation.

On the supply side, the commercial economy's lethargy is driving hundreds of technology companies into the government market and, more significantly, increasing the expectations of firms already well established there. The only things growing faster than the federal IT budget are federal IT businesses' revenue targets. The federal IT industry is booming. Occasional hiccups, such as continuing resolutions or slow reorganizations, mean occasional missed targets. But the prevailing view is that, overall, the market is robust and sustainable.

How long will the heightened demand continue? With the deficit in fiscal 2004 set to exceed $500 billion, tax cuts likely to be extended and the need for a strong defense budget widely accepted, Wall Street is starting to get nervous about the macroeconomic picture. The fiscal 2005 budget guidance to agencies is close to a "current services," or flat, level. Inevitably, budgets will get tighter.

But what do tighter budgets mean for IT? A common reaction on Capitol Hill is that IT is an administrative cost and thus easily cut. Members of Congress miss the link between information and mission.

The Agriculture Department's 2004 budget is a case in point. The House denied the Bush administration's $44 million requested increase for replacing aging business and technology systems, streamlining business procedures and sharing information, in favor of commodity, nutrition and research programs representatives perceive as more mission-oriented.

Although agencies are getting better at making the mission-linked business case for technology investments to the Office of Management and Budget, industry is still behind the curve when it comes to walking the walk and talking the talk. Walking the walk means producing savings and mission-performance improvements. Talking the talk means publicizing these successes to decision-makers.

The dot-com bubble burst when promised successes were not delivered. As Gertrude Stein said, those who fail to learn from history are forced to repeat it, and the rest of us are forced to repeat it with them. Let's organize to make the case that information, and the technology that supports it, does matter.

McConnell, former chief of information policy and technology at the Office of Management and Budget, is president of McConnell International LLC (www.mcconnellinternational.com).

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.