Rescuing a good idea

When it comes to government procurement, one thing unlikely to bring about significant cultural change is a lot of talk.

It's easy enough to tout the benefits of performance-based acquisitions. The basic concept — in which contract payments are tied to specific performance metrics — makes good sense. Such an approach can save agencies from sinking more money into failing programs. It also can inspire ingenuity in contractors, because they are not told how to solve a problem, but only what metrics to hit.

Still, it's no use trying to sell contracting officers on the concept if they do not have the know-how to pull it off. The problems begin with defining metrics. How do you quantifiably gauge the success of a program? And how do you settle on metrics agreeable to both the agency and the contractor? Also, procurement experts say this approach is not appropriate for all acquisitions. How do you know when to use it?

Performance-based contracting represents a new way of doing business for most agencies. Many contracting officers will resist the change if they feel ill prepared, as some clearly do. In such a situation, agencies would be better off steering clear of it altogether. The surest way to stop innovation is to highlight a couple of dismal failures.

That is not to say performance-based contracting is an intrinsically bad idea. But the best idea looks like a bad one if not well-managed.

Procurement officials should make a concerted effort to provide contracting officials with the necessary training. Rather than each agency being left to its own devices, the Bush administration should support the development of a central training program to which agencies can send contracting officers as needed. This program could also serve as a repository for lessons learned and best practices culled by individual agencies.

If the administration wants to make performance-based contracting a priority, it ought to treat it like one.

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.

Featured

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1996, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

  • Shutterstock image.

    Merged IT modernization bill punts on funding

    A House panel approved a new IT modernization bill that appears poised to pass, but key funding questions are left for appropriators.

  • General Frost

    Army wants cyber capability everywhere

    The Army's cyber director said cyber, electronic warfare and information operations must be integrated into warfighters' doctrine and training.

  • Rising Star 2013

    Meet the 2016 Rising Stars

    FCW honors 30 early-career leaders in federal IT.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group