Feds see red over OMB scoring

After two years of color-coded bubble-chart grading, some federal officials say they've had enough of the Office of Management and Budget's quarterly evaluations of agency progress in implementing the President's Management Agenda.

"A single color is too simplistic a measure for the complexities you need to take into account in an agency's success," said David Chu, undersecretary of Defense for personnel and readiness. He spoke during a panel discussion in Washington, D.C., last week at the Excellence in Government 2004 conference.

Chu was referring to OMB's tricolor score card, in which green signifies total success, yellow means an agency has achieved some criteria and red indicates serious flaws.

Others agreed that colors can be misleading. "Red is not red is not red," said William Campbell, the Department of Veterans Affairs' assistant secretary for management, chief financial officer and chief human capital officer. "Neither is green or yellow. It is difficult, in my mind, to compare the red from one agency to another."

Campbell said the VA received a red score for competitive sourcing in OMB's score card for the quarter ending June 30. But, rather than signaling noncompliance, that score masks a structural obstacle, Campbell said.

VA officials cannot use medical care funds for conducting competitive sourcing studies, he said.

VA officials have unsuccessfully sought to persuade Congress to repeal that prohibition. Unless OMB officials allow the VA to "do some other things that don't require the studies," the VA will always be rated red in that area, Campbell said.

The score cards provide a reason for people to care about the management agenda, said Kim Nelson, the Environmental Protection Agency's chief information officer and a defender of the score cards process. "It's the best thing I've seen in a long time," she said during the panel discussion.

A spokesman for Tom Davis (R-Va.), chairman of the House Government Reform Committee, said the simplicity of OMB's grading is a positive feature. "The bottom line is that it's easy to understand, it's visible, agencies pay attention to it and agencies focus on how they performed compared to other agencies."

Dave McClure, vice president for e-government at the Council for Excellence in Government, said "all agencies know what they're accountable for under the President's Management Agenda...so it's something that certainly can be factored into a budget proposal."

About the Author

David Perera is a special contributor to Defense Systems.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.