Feds see red over OMB scoring

After two years of color-coded bubble-chart grading, some federal officials say they've had enough of the Office of Management and Budget's quarterly evaluations of agency progress in implementing the President's Management Agenda.

"A single color is too simplistic a measure for the complexities you need to take into account in an agency's success," said David Chu, undersecretary of Defense for personnel and readiness. He spoke during a panel discussion in Washington, D.C., last week at the Excellence in Government 2004 conference.

Chu was referring to OMB's tricolor score card, in which green signifies total success, yellow means an agency has achieved some criteria and red indicates serious flaws.

Others agreed that colors can be misleading. "Red is not red is not red," said William Campbell, the Department of Veterans Affairs' assistant secretary for management, chief financial officer and chief human capital officer. "Neither is green or yellow. It is difficult, in my mind, to compare the red from one agency to another."

Campbell said the VA received a red score for competitive sourcing in OMB's score card for the quarter ending June 30. But, rather than signaling noncompliance, that score masks a structural obstacle, Campbell said.

VA officials cannot use medical care funds for conducting competitive sourcing studies, he said.

VA officials have unsuccessfully sought to persuade Congress to repeal that prohibition. Unless OMB officials allow the VA to "do some other things that don't require the studies," the VA will always be rated red in that area, Campbell said.

The score cards provide a reason for people to care about the management agenda, said Kim Nelson, the Environmental Protection Agency's chief information officer and a defender of the score cards process. "It's the best thing I've seen in a long time," she said during the panel discussion.

A spokesman for Tom Davis (R-Va.), chairman of the House Government Reform Committee, said the simplicity of OMB's grading is a positive feature. "The bottom line is that it's easy to understand, it's visible, agencies pay attention to it and agencies focus on how they performed compared to other agencies."

Dave McClure, vice president for e-government at the Council for Excellence in Government, said "all agencies know what they're accountable for under the President's Management Agenda...so it's something that certainly can be factored into a budget proposal."

About the Author

David Perera is a special contributor to Defense Systems.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group