Editorial: The price of data

Related Links

"Value add?"

The issue of public/private competition has always been complex and nuanced. And it is not a new issue.

But the Web and the easy availability of government data have added to the simmering tensions among commercial publishers and public-interest groups.

Today, federal agencies can easily make large amounts of information available to the public directly and inexpensively.

Officials at private-sector organizations argue that the government should not compete with their businesses. But broader

issues exist, such as the public's right to know and access information that they paid for with taxes.

The examples are numerous. The Internal Revenue Service was one of the first to confront the competition issue when IRS officials sought to allow citizens to file their tax returns online for free. The proposal seemed to make perfect sense. Electronic filing is seen as a boon for

the tax agency because it all but eliminates errors.

But tax-preparing organizations balked. They have since relented, and last year, some taxpayers could file their taxes online at IRS.gov for free.

The Library of Congress' Thomas Web site, which posts bills from Congress, seems like another clear-cut example. Thomas has not been expanded largely because officials at the companies that provide bill-tracking services have argued that the government is infringing on their businesses.

Officials at the private-sector companies argue, of course, that the services they provide add value to the widely available information.

Some areas should be off-limits for government. For example, pushing data to users is something that is better left to private companies in most cases. However, government information should be available to people who seek it.

That could leave private companies in the sometimes unpleasant position of reassessing what value their services actually add. And in fact it is competition.

But it is exactly that kind of competition that spurs innovation. Rather than attempting to stop change, companies need to innovate so they can earn their pay.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group