Editorial: Bridging the chasm

Federal Computer Week covers many stories that demonstrate communication problems among techies and program officials responsible for records management, financial management and enterprise architecture, for example.

In each of those cases, technologists who are information technology experts try to work with their counterparts who have expertise in those program areas. But as in the Tower of Babel, people are unable to talk to one another because they speak different languages. To some extent, the two sides live on different planes of existence.

The chasm between technologists and records managers has a long history. It's not surprising, though, because technologists are interested in the latest and greatest and often focus on creating products that make users' lives easier. Records managers and archivists are interested in preservation, a duty IT makes extremely difficult. As challenging as it is to open a 5-year-old DOS XyWrite document today, imagine trying to open that document in 50 or 100 years.

Sometimes the chasm separating the two parties can seem even bigger. The National Archives and Records Administration has the unenviable task of devising a way to deal with all those electronic documents and maintain them so that they will be useful to future generations.

To help them do this, NARA officials posted a Federal Register notice earlier this month about the destruction of Clinton-era backup tapes. That notice should have made perfect sense to NARA officials — although that is in question, too — but it wreaked havoc on the other planes of existence.

"This is not material that should be destroyed. [The notice] is so poorly written," said Scott Armstrong, a journalist who has become something of a records management guru. He has been a powerful advocate for making government more transparent and open to the public, and records are an essential part of an open government.

NARA officials have acknowledged that the notice was not their finest work. But it illustrates the larger problem — a fundamental lack of communication. The best solution is enabling people to move beyond their cliques so they can begin understanding their counterparts.

Records are important, and IT clearly isn't going away. So it is critically important we find a way to bridge the chasm.

— Christopher J. Dorobek

Rising Stars

Meet 21 early-career leaders who are doing great things in federal IT.

Featured

  • SEC Chairman Jay Clayton

    SEC owns up to 2016 breach

    A key database of financial information was breached in 2016, possibly in support of insider trading, said the Securities and Exchange Commission.

  • Image from Shutterstock.com

    DOD looks to get aggressive about cloud adoption

    Defense leaders and Congress are looking to encourage more aggressive cloud policies and prod reluctant agencies to embrace experimentation and risk-taking.

  • Shutterstock / Pictofigo

    The next big thing in IT procurement

    Steve Kelman talks to the agencies that have embraced tech demos in their acquisition efforts -- and urges others in government to give it a try.

  • broken lock

    DHS bans Kaspersky from federal systems

    The Department of Homeland Security banned the Russian cybersecurity company Kaspersky Lab’s products from federal agencies in a new binding operational directive.

  • man planning layoffs

    USDA looks to cut CIOs as part of reorg

    The Department of Agriculture is looking to cut down on the number of agency CIOs in the name of efficiency and better communication across mission areas.

  • What's next for agency cyber efforts?

    Ninety days after the Trump administration's executive order, FCW sat down with agency cyber leaders to discuss what’s changing.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group