Editorial: Making the important decision

It was refreshing to see Mike Griffin, NASA's new administrator, telling employees that the work they do is important. Feds just don't hear enough positive feedback these days. Griffin, however, went further by informing employees at Ames Research Center that he plans to cut back on the outsourcing of research projects so that NASA employees can refocus on basic research.

The Bush administration's competitive sourcing initiative has attempted to improve government efficiency. The system is far from perfect, but it has the virtue of adopting a popular theory — that competition spurs organizations to work better and faster and to focus on results — and putting it to the test.

All the test results are not yet in.

Of course, the Bush administration sees successes. The initiative is reducing costs, according to the Office of Management and Budget's "Report on Competitive Sourcing Results" for fiscal 2004, which was issued last week. The report states that every dollar spent on competitive sourcing that year will produce $20 in savings during the next five years.

There were concerns that OMB's A-76 revisions would "dismantle the [government] workforce," but federal employees were selected to perform in about 91 percent of the A-76 competitions in fiscal 2004, according to the report.

What is less clear is whether competition has improved programs.

The first and most important step of the competitive sourcing process is to determine what should — and what should not — be opened to competition. Agencies must determine if a task is "inherently governmental." The term is unfortunate, but the issue it raises is essential.

There are some tasks that are just too important to be outsourced and that do not improve with competition. Griffin is correct to focus on research and development, a critically important subject for NASA and the country. It is an area that needs more attention generally and one that seems not to benefit from competition.

Griffin has provided few details about what his approach may mean. It seems that he is swimming against the current. But we give him credit for raising the subject.

To insource or to outsource? It is not an easy question to answer.

— Christopher J. Dorobek

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Shutterstock image: looking for code.

    How DOD embraced bug bounties -- and how your agency can, too

    Hack the Pentagon proved to Defense Department officials that outside hackers can be assets, not adversaries.

  • Shutterstock image: cyber defense.

    Why PPD-41 is evolutionary, not revolutionary

    Government cybersecurity officials say the presidential policy directive codifies cyber incident response protocols but doesn't radically change what's been in practice in recent years.

  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group