Editorial: Making the important decision

It was refreshing to see Mike Griffin, NASA's new administrator, telling employees that the work they do is important. Feds just don't hear enough positive feedback these days. Griffin, however, went further by informing employees at Ames Research Center that he plans to cut back on the outsourcing of research projects so that NASA employees can refocus on basic research.

The Bush administration's competitive sourcing initiative has attempted to improve government efficiency. The system is far from perfect, but it has the virtue of adopting a popular theory — that competition spurs organizations to work better and faster and to focus on results — and putting it to the test.

All the test results are not yet in.

Of course, the Bush administration sees successes. The initiative is reducing costs, according to the Office of Management and Budget's "Report on Competitive Sourcing Results" for fiscal 2004, which was issued last week. The report states that every dollar spent on competitive sourcing that year will produce $20 in savings during the next five years.

There were concerns that OMB's A-76 revisions would "dismantle the [government] workforce," but federal employees were selected to perform in about 91 percent of the A-76 competitions in fiscal 2004, according to the report.

What is less clear is whether competition has improved programs.

The first and most important step of the competitive sourcing process is to determine what should — and what should not — be opened to competition. Agencies must determine if a task is "inherently governmental." The term is unfortunate, but the issue it raises is essential.

There are some tasks that are just too important to be outsourced and that do not improve with competition. Griffin is correct to focus on research and development, a critically important subject for NASA and the country. It is an area that needs more attention generally and one that seems not to benefit from competition.

Griffin has provided few details about what his approach may mean. It seems that he is swimming against the current. But we give him credit for raising the subject.

To insource or to outsource? It is not an easy question to answer.

— Christopher J. Dorobek

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.

Featured

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1986, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

  • Shutterstock image.

    Merged IT modernization bill punts on funding

    A House panel approved a new IT modernization bill that appears poised to pass, but key funding questions are left for appropriators.

  • General Frost

    Army wants cyber capability everywhere

    The Army's cyber director said cyber, electronic warfare and information operations must be integrated into warfighters' doctrine and training.

  • Rising Star 2013

    Meet the 2016 Rising Stars

    FCW honors 30 early-career leaders in federal IT.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group