No summer vacation for competitive sourcing

Lawmakers, unions and OMB prepare for more battles over jobs

Report on Competitive Sourcing Results Fiscal Year 2004

Related Links

As lawmakers meet this summer to approve spending bills for fiscal 2006, they will be dealing with a substantial number of House-approved bills that uphold the status quo on competitive sourcing, a policy that encourages agencies to cut costs by putting some jobs up for bid against the private sector.

But opponents of competitive sourcing are promising to act. For each of the past two years, Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) has offered an anti-competitive sourcing amendment to the Treasury-Transportation Appropriations bill. The amendment would block federal agencies from using the revised Circular A-76, the Office of Management and Budget's rulebook on competitive sourcing. He will likely offer it again this year, a Van Hollen spokeswoman said.

House appropriators stripped $2 million from the Army Corps of Engineers' budget request for competitive-sourcing studies, even though the agency is preparing to release a request for proposals to compete all U.S.-based information technology support jobs.

According to recently released figures from OMB, every dollar spent on competitive sourcing in fiscal 2004 will produce $20 in savings during the next five years. IT jobs were the second most-competed jobs in fiscal 2004, OMB's latest analysis shows.

Union officials disputed the savings that OMB officials cite. "Time will tell if that kind of money is saved, and I believe it will not be," said Colleen Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union.

"Hundreds and sometimes thousands of federal employees are immediately and adversely impacted by the decision to conduct a competitive-sourcing study," Kelley said. "The figures OMB demands from the agencies in no way reflect the true costs."

John Threlkeld, the American Federation of Government Employees' Capitol Hill lobbyist, dismissed the agency's findings. "If only OMB devoted as much time to ensuring agencies accurately track the costs of conducting privatization reviews as it does trumpeting wholly projected and completely unverified savings estimates."

OMB officials, meanwhile, are preparing to expand competitive sourcing. They have issued new guidance and promised greater oversight of agencies' competitive-sourcing initiatives. In a memo issued last month, OMB instructs agencies that, with the exception of contracting officers, no job should automatically be exempt from competitive sourcing. An exemption should be granted for a job only if its loss to the private sector would result in substantial risk to the agency's ability to accomplish its mission, the OMB memo states.

To expand their oversight of competitive sourcing, OMB officials will ask agencies to inform them about competitions in which no companies participate, said David Safavian, administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy.

Paradoxically, while competitive-sourcing foes portray the policy as a threat to the federal workforce, OMB officials worry that job competitions suffer from anemic industry participation.

"Our biggest challenge right now is to make sure that the private sector maintains an interest in this process," Safavian said, noting that in fiscal 2004, government teams won 91 percent of all competitive-sourcing bids.

OMB's analysis shows that competitions involving two or more private-sector bidders generated about $10,000 more in savings per full-time equivalent employee than competitions with only one or no private-sector bidders.

"You never know whether we have a benchmark level of service or a benchmark cost until you've competed it against the private sector," Safavian said. n

Saving dollars

A recently released Office of Management and Budget report on competitive-sourcing activities during fiscal 2004 states that:

n Agencies held 217 competitions involving 12,573 full-time equivalent employees (FTEs).

n For every FTE studied, the government will save $22,000 per year. That amounts to a savings of $1.4 billion in five years.

n Agencies will achieve those savings through workforce realignments, process re-engineering, technology investments, operational consolidations and other efficiencies, according to the report.

About the Author

David Perera is a special contributor to Defense Systems.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group