Provisions could hurt contractors

Industry groups are opposing two amendments to the Defense Department authorization bill that they say would hinder contractors. One proposal would limit prime contractors' flexibility in charging for services that subcontractors provide, and the other would force agencies buying from the General Services Administration's schedule contracts to get at least two price quotes from small businesses.

The latter amendment, proposed by Sen. Olympia Snow (R-Maine), is based on a misconception that small businesses are not getting purchases through the schedules, said Larry Allen, executive vice president of the Coalition for Government Procurement.

"If this amendment were to go through, you'd be hurting more small businesses than you help because you create a hurdle that isn't there for any other contract process," he said.

Too many small companies believe that just getting a schedule contract should bring them business, Allen said.

"What it comes down to is your ability to sell and get yourself in front of the customer," he said.

The other amendment, which Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) proposed, is an attempt to settle an old debate between GSA and the Defense Contract Audit Authority over whether prime contractors can charge customers more for services provided by subcontractors than the subcontractors themselves charge.

The amendment would allow prime contractors to charge only the rates that are included in the original contract. The Professional Services Council and the Information Technology Association of America have objected.

"These are fixed labor rates," said Stan Soloway, president of the council. "Once you've established that the fixed labor rate is a fair rate, the burden shifts to the contractor, who is going to lose money if the [actual] rate turns out to be higher than that."

Congress shelved debate on the bill before the summer recess, so the proposals will remain unresolved until lawmakers return to Washington, D.C., after the Labor Day holiday.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Shutterstock image: looking for code.

    How DOD embraced bug bounties -- and how your agency can, too

    Hack the Pentagon proved to Defense Department officials that outside hackers can be assets, not adversaries.

  • Shutterstock image: cyber defense.

    Why PPD-41 is evolutionary, not revolutionary

    Government cybersecurity officials say the presidential policy directive codifies cyber incident response protocols but doesn't radically change what's been in practice in recent years.

  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group