Feds secretly reclassify data

Thousands of documents have been taken off the shelves but left on the Internet

Thousands of declassified documents have been secretly reclassified and removed from the shelves of the National Archives and Records Administration’s research facility in Maryland, including some documents that are still publicly available on the Internet. But the government does not plan to take the classified material off-line.

Although many people are concerned that the government may have removed harmless but useful historical information, little fuss has developed about how reclassification controls apply to the Web, some experts say. That is surprising because NARA’s flagship project is the Electronic Records Archives, the first effort to save government records regardless of format and make them accessible on future hardware and software.

The declassified documents in question are at least 25 years old, meaning they are mostly paper records. Under an executive order issued by former President Clinton, agencies must declassify or exempt all documents created at least 25 years ago that contain national security information.

The discovery of the secret program was made by Matthew Aid, a historian specializing in intelligence who said he could no longer find many of the documents that he had copied years ago from NARA’s shelves.

Aid announced last week that he and other researchers have taken steps to stop the reclassification program.

For the past seven years, at least six intelligence agencies, including the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and the Defense and Justice departments, have been secretly revoking access to 9,500 historical documents. After concerned researchers confronted NARA a few weeks ago, agency officials began an audit of the program.

Last week, NARA officials would only confirm that 9,500 documents have been reclassified by their originating agencies whose officials believed the classified information had been improperly or inadvertently released.

But NARA will not modify documents online, said J. William Leonard, director of NARA’s Information Security Oversight Office. “It is not NARA’s role, nor would we even advocate the removal of such information from the Web,” he said.

The office will release a report in the next two months about restoring the maximum amount of information to public view and defining procedures to ensure that future classification efforts are appropriate.

Of the 15 examples of reclassified documents posted on the National Security Archive’s Web site, eight were published in the State Department’s Foreign Relations of the United States series or the microfiche supplements to that series.

The Government Printing Office, which is responsible for informing the public about government work, is not part of the reclassification program, GPO officials said. The agencies have not told GPO to remove material from the federal library system or GPO Access, a Web portal with reams of documents published by all three branches of government.

Open-government advocate Steven Aftergood, director of the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists, said the lessons learned would more likely govern how agencies and NARA should go about reclassifying paper, not electronic, records.

“It may be that there’s no serious online impact at all,” he said. “At the moment, it looks like there was some enormous overreaction that led to the absurd result of removing published documents from the archives.”

Some reclassified records remain online

Two documents, more than half-a-century-old, are representative of thousands of declassified records that have been withdrawn since 2001 from open shelves at the National Archives and Records Administration’s research facility. Critics of NARA’s ongoing reclassification program argue that the records do not meet the standards for classification.

  • Note, McCluney to Hulten, Jan. 26, 1948, with attached memorandum, “The Foreign Service Program in Support of Research and Intelligence.” Secret.

    This document is about the State Department’s program to buy maps and foreign periodicals on behalf of the U.S. intelligence community. Researchers can access it online at www.foia.state.gov.


  • Note, Humelsine to Jack, with attached memorandum of conversation, “Publicity on Bogota Intelligence Reports,” April 16, 1948. Secret.

    This document contains a complaint from the CIA’s director to the State Department about the bad publicity the CIA was receiving after its failure to predict anti-American riots in Bogota, Colombia, in 1948. Researchers can access it online at www.foia.state.gov.

Source: National Security Archives

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.

Featured

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

  • Shutterstock image.

    Merged IT modernization bill punts on funding

    A House panel approved a new IT modernization bill that appears poised to pass, but key funding questions are left for appropriators.

  • General Frost

    Army wants cyber capability everywhere

    The Army's cyber director said cyber, electronic warfare and information operations must be integrated into warfighters' doctrine and training.

  • Rising Star 2013

    Meet the 2016 Rising Stars

    FCW honors 30 early-career leaders in federal IT.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group