Reverse auctions losing bid for broad use

But GSA officials, saying the method has shown success, push for wider adoption

Perhaps the most successful federal example of a reverse auction came in 2000, when the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) needed 6,200 computers and a few hundred more laptop PCs and printers.

The General Services Administration opened the acquisition to a reverse auction, in which companies try to underbid one another to get the contract. At the end of the process, DFAS had bought its desktop computers, 200 laptop PCs and nearly 1,000 printers at a savings estimated at more than $2.2 million compared with what it likely would have spent under more conventional procurement terms, said David Drabkin, acting assistant commissioner for acquisition at GSA’s Federal Technology Service.

Indeed, the DFAS case seemed to open the door for widespread reverse auctions, Drabkin said. “Reverse auctions were de rigueur for government contracting,” he added. “Everybody was getting involved.”

States got into the act, too. Pennsylvania conducted reverse auctions through Ariba’s to buy coal to heat state office buildings and aluminum to manufacture license plates.

Then the technology bubble burst, and reverse auctions rapidly declined. Now, federal agencies don’t use the procurement tool to the degree that they could, Drabkin said. But that attitude might be changing.

Part of the problem is that some agency officials apparently believe reverse auctions aren’t allowed, Drabkin said. However, “there is no prohibition currently in the [Federal Acquisition Regulation] or in any statute to using reverse auctioning as a tool in government procurement,” he said. “In fact, when you look at the FAR Part 1 we wrote in 1993, [there is] some very helpful language that says if it’s not prohibited, it’s permitted.”

To boost federal agencies’ use of reverse auctions, GSA recently signed a five-year contract with online marketplace FedBid to provide such services.

Reverse auctions work only for some commodity buys, Drabkin said. The approach doesn’t work well for integrated solutions. “It does work very well with off-the-shelf types of purchases, items that can be characterized and quantified,” he said.

Such purchases include computers, peripheral devices, laptop PCs and other products that some agencies order by the truckload, including lower-tech supplies.

Brendan Walsh, FedBid’s co-founder and vice president, said the company’s first year of operation — 2002 — was weak because the technology bubble had just burst.

Now he sees new, more focused light at the end of the tunnel. Since then, the company has facilitated more than 17,000 online reverse auctions for a variety of federal agencies.

Typical buys are worth $2,500 to $100,000, with FedBid receiving a maximum 3 percent fee. Walsh is in the process of expanding the company’s offices to accommodate the growth. He identified the other major factor limiting agencies’ use of reverse auctions: vendors’ reluctance to participate.

“We’ve heard from a few sellers who don’t like to compete,” he said. “Typically, they see themselves losing some contractual or other advantage they may have over their competitors.”

When conducted correctly, reverse auctions can be efficient and quick, said Max Peterson, who has participated in many reverse auctions as vice president of federal sales at CDW Government. But he sees no strong benefits for giant IT suppliers like CDW-G.

In fact, by focusing solely on the best price, the buyer might not get everything he or she expects, such as brand-name products, prompt delivery and compatibility with existing technology, he said.

“CDW sells $6.3 billion worth of [information technology] equipment — that’s an awful lot of leverage when it comes to volume and prices,” Peterson said. “So we scratch our heads when somebody else comes in with a much, much lower bid. That’s when we wonder, is the buyer getting an apples-to-apples comparison?”

Hubler is a freelance writer based in Northern Virginia.


Decision tree

Reverse auctions can be used to procure many commodities, especially when commercial products meet an agency’s needs without any customization, and when they are needed quickly.

But there are some additional factors to consider, and General Services Administration officials say reverse auctions are probably not the purchasing tool to use when:

  • The market is volatile.

  • The quality of the products on the market is questionable.

  • The agency needs an integrated solution rather than an off-the-shelf solution.

Source: General Services Administration

About the Author

David Hubler is the former print managing editor for GCN and senior editor for Washington Technology. He is freelance writer living in Annandale, Va.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group