Risk management critical for FISMA success

Experts say IGs, execs must agree on common enforcement and audits

Federal agencies made progress in using risk management to enhance computer security in fiscal 2005, the Office of Management and Budget concluded last week. But some information security experts say government auditors and executives are keeping agencies from wielding that tool effectively.

OMB released a report March 1 on 25 federal agencies’ performance in complying with the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) of 2002. FISMA aims to improve the security of federal information systems.

The total number of federal IT systems grew by 19 percent from fiscal 2004 to fiscal 2005, from 8,623 to 10,289. The number of certified and accredited systems skyrocketed 32 percent, from 6,607 to 8,735. The number of tested contingency plans rose 28 percent, from 4,886 to 6,233.

The number of systems tested for security controls dropped 4 percent overall from fiscal 2004 to fiscal 2005, from 76 percent to 72 percent. OMB did not see that as a problem, however, because fiscal 2005 was the first year in which agencies prioritized IT systems according to high, medium and low risk to spend more wisely on security.

“It is apparent from the data that agencies are properly prioritizing security control testing since the percentage of high-impact systems tested was appreciably higher at 83 percent,” the report states. Agencies certified nearly 90 percent of their high-risk systems.

Even as OMB said agencies are using risk management to enhance security, federal and industry FISMA experts say the government must give federal information assurance staff more leeway to use it.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology’s guidelines for FISMA risk management are open to interpretation, said Patrick McBride, vice president of compliance solutions at Scalable Software. Inspectors general at some agencies enforce the letter of the law, while others give their agencies discretion in applying them.

NIST guidelines for FISMA encourage agencies to prioritize IT systems by risk, said Mischel Kwon, information assurance director at the Justice Department’s Wireless Management Office. OMB and agency IGs agree with that in principle, she said, but don’t judge audits that way — they hold all to the highest standards.

Unless IGs and agency leaders provide more leeway, Kwon said, information security staff will still have to certify every system as high priority, continuing a cycle of overwork and frustration.

IGs are risk-averse by nature, which makes it difficult for some agencies to adopt risk-management strategies, McBride said.

Another reason that IGs and top executives demand all systems be treated as high risk is that they don’t have the IT expertise to understand security problems, said Ron Ross, who leads NIST’s FISMA Implementation Project. “We’re on totally different wavelengths,” he said.

NIST and other FISMA implementers must get chief information security officers, chief information officers and IGs together to hear the same information and establish appropriate expectations, Ross said. “There’s no substitute for good communication and support from the top of the enterprise,” he said.



Tightening the noose

According to the Office of Management and Budget, federal agencies spent $5 billion on information technology security in fiscal 2005 — roughly 8 percent of their total IT investment of about $62 billion.

Fiscal 2005 was the first year in which federal agencies prioritized their IT systems by high, medium or low risk. Of the 9,184 agency systems, 1,646 were rated high, 2,497 medium and 4,456 low; 585 were not categorized.

Of the high-risk systems, 88 percent had been certified and accredited, 83 percent had tested security controls, and 62 percent had tested contingency plans.

The Defense Department increased its percentage of certified and accredited systems from 58 percent to 82 percent. The Department of Veterans Affairs did even better, rising from 14 percent to 100 percent.

OMB has asked agency IT security managers to adhere to information assurance guidelines issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Agencies should maintain system inventories, security configurations, contingency plans and contractor oversight. OMB also recommended that agencies continue improving their procedures for certification and accreditation, and Plans of Action and Milestones.

— Michael Arnone

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group