Editorial: Security, not secrecy

No elite group of experts, however bright they might be, can match the collective wisdom of the security industry

Contrary to the Bush administration’s apparent perception, security and transparency are not necessarily incompatible goals.

As is well known, in January, the administration launched the Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative, an effort to tighten the security of government networks and other elements of the country’s critical infrastructure. But that is all that is well known.

During the past nine months, the broad outline of the initiative has emerged slowly, but details about specific components remain closely guarded, ostensibly in the interest of national security. Congress and government watchdog organizations have begun to question whether the secrecy is needed — or wise. 

In its report on the National Defense Authorization Act of 2009, the Senate Armed Services Committee criticized the Bush administration for moving aggressively on such an ambitious plan with so little review and debate, either by Congress or in the public.

The committee is particularly concerned about the initiative’s potential legal and privacy ramifications. But the lack of oversight is not the only danger.

In keeping the program under such tight wraps, the administration misses an opportunity to benefit from the knowledge of security experts nationwide. No doubt the Homeland Security Department, which oversees the program, consulted with the best and brightest in industry and academia in developing the initiative. But that is not enough.

The next step is to vet that strategy with the broader community, giving experts from different fields an opportunity to pick apart or refine various components. Such a process would not be neat and tidy, nor would it be fast, but it would produce a much better initiative in the end. No elite group of experts, however bright they might be, can match the collective wisdom of the security industry.

Of course, it truly might be in the interest of national security to keep some elements of the strategy classified. But it is in the nation’s best interest to ensure that the strategy as a whole is given the thorough analysis that it deserves. 

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.