Buzz of the Week

Feds on Facebook: A status update

Now that agencies have a green light to use Facebook, should they? Opinions among FCW readers vary, but many urge caution. Here is a sampling of comments received on recent Facebook articles.

Pro:

Taxpayers expect me to do the best job I can do — part of my job is to reach out to young people. If my IT system is stuck in the 20th century, I can’t do that efficiently. Social networks are where my outreach needs to be. If I can’t use them, I’m not doing my job as well or as efficiently as I should be able to! -- Interpreter

One way the feds could use Facebook is to create groups and moderate those groups for information about applying for careers; grants; and accessing and understanding public information like census reports, patent data, etc. Currently, these government sources are like a blank wall that you [can] read, but if you communicate to them, you get a generic response in return. — Anonymous

What is this?!? Fear of public speaking in Web 2.0? Poppycock. Speak your mind. And use the tool for what it is good for. But recognize you are in public when you do so. And recognize there is no rule of nonattribution for Facebook. Common sense. — Anonymous

Con:

How do we know that all of the Facebook people will protect my privacy and not leak the data? Imagine the network mapping that one insider could perform! — Anonymous

Social networking indeed. These are the types of notices we’ll get: John Doe has joined XYZ group. Jane Doe is now connected to her mother. Jack Roe has joined UVA Alumni Association. Susan Smith commented on Michael Jackson’s photo; Michael Jackson responded, and we’ll be able to see their exchange on our profiles. — Anonymous

Sorry. Social-networking information should not be incorporated into a government site or workspace. [It is] not appropriate or needed. There are no common ground rules for what is appropriate and agencies and departments should not be encouraging the use of Facebook-like spaces to do our work. That is not what the taxpayers and the Congress expect from us. — Anonymous

As someone who reluctantly has a Facebook profile to keep in touch with select longtime friends who live all over the country, I don’t want to share that profile with professional colleagues. — Anonymous

Outside of work, I have work friends who approach me on Facebook, and I politely don’t accept. If someone is so concerned about this, why not have play time on Facebook and pro time on LinkedIn – that’s what I do. The rule for me is, if you don’t want something to be public, don’t ever put it on the Internet in any form.  — Anonymous

While I can understand to a degree some value for using Facebook as a work tool, I cannot recommend it nor would I be a willing participant. I very much keep my private and professional life separate and always will. But the most important reason is that a wrong click on Facebook can open you up to hijacking, Trojans, etc. As careful and knowledgeable as I consider myself, I got grabbed by one and spent several hours cleaning it up. This, despite a firewall and an up-to-date antivirus program. If you want this kind of open sharing, use something else — create a federal “facespace” — mlmcgaffey

The middle way:

How about this: Have a Facebook account for personal use, with just your friends, and a Facebook account for public use, where your opinions will clearly be representative of the organization that you work for, or are associated with. This may not be practical or the way that Facebook works, but to me, it would solve the problem for federal workers if they had two separate forums. — Anonymous

Social Media is part of the new media. It is not a fad. It is a tool. And I will use every tool — medium — to do my job, whether that is an old-school brochure, or posting notifications on Twitter or Facebook. In fact, posting the messages on the latter is a whole lot less expensive for taxpayers than a glossy, resource-intensive brochure that ends up in the waste pile! Anyone saying it's inappropriate for government, I ask you to really examine it before you reject it outright!  — Donna Hawthorne

The Fed 100

Save the date for 28th annual Federal 100 Awards Gala.

Featured

  • computer network

    How Einstein changes the way government does business

    The Department of Commerce is revising its confidentiality agreement for statistical data survey respondents to reflect the fact that the Department of Homeland Security could see some of that data if it is captured by the Einstein system.

  • Defense Secretary Jim Mattis. Army photo by Monica King. Jan. 26, 2017.

    Mattis mulls consolidation in IT, cyber

    In a Feb. 17 memo, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis told senior leadership to establish teams to look for duplication across the armed services in business operations, including in IT and cybersecurity.

  • Image from Shutterstock.com

    DHS vague on rules for election aid, say states

    State election officials had more questions than answers after a Department of Homeland Security presentation on the designation of election systems as critical U.S. infrastructure.

  • Org Chart Stock Art - Shutterstock

    How the hiring freeze targets millennials

    The government desperately needs younger talent to replace an aging workforce, and experts say that a freeze on hiring doesn't help.

  • Shutterstock image: healthcare digital interface.

    VA moves ahead with homegrown scheduling IT

    The Department of Veterans Affairs will test an internally developed scheduling module at primary care sites nationwide to see if it's ready to service the entire agency.

  • Shutterstock images (honglouwawa & 0beron): Bitcoin image overlay replaced with a dollar sign on a hardware circuit.

    MGT Act poised for a comeback

    After missing in the last Congress, drafters of a bill to encourage cloud adoption are looking for a new plan.

Reader comments

Tue, Mar 16, 2010 Doomer

First off, it is (was?) illegal for the federal government to spy on it's own citizens. Using Facebook or any other tool to gather information on citizens would have been illegal, except President Obama changed the law recently as anyone, at the President's discretion, can be deemed an "underprivileged enemy belligerent" which essentially means, anyone who opposes the federal agenda. You don't like the current Health Care Bill?.. bite your tongue or men in black will shut you up. Want to protest..anything, off to jail you go. Facebook is a tool, the feds use of the tool is the issue. ie Guns don't kill people, people kill people.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group