Birthers find FCW

Open Government Dialogue sliming draws readers

Federal Computer Week received its share of abuse after reporting on how the Open Government Dialogue was overrun by individuals demanding that President Barack Obama produce evidence that he is a natural-born citizen of the United States. In short, we wrote that the dialogue got slimed.

The article, which appeared as the Buzz of the Week in the June 8 print edition, received hundreds of comments in a short time. However, it is our policy to approve comments before posting, and we informed readers that we would not post comments that simply reiterated their charges. Instead, we invited them to comment on the process used to manage the Open Government Dialogue or any other aspect of online public engagement.

Here is a sampling of the comments — edited for length and clarity — that we received and posted.

The issue is not that birthers have posted their pet issue — it's that it was posted over and over again to the point of crowding out other ideas and skewing discourse far away from the original intent of the OGD. Had the birthers posted the idea in a single location and repeatedly voted for it, this article wouldn't have been written.
— CalamityChris

So, when lots of folks agree with your position, that's a majority, a groundswell of public opinion.… But when lots disagree with your opinion, that same level of expression becomes “slime?"
— Anonymous

One could certainly make the case for removing insulting posts, but posts that make a thoughtful case on the eligibility issue should not be removed if transparency is the goal. This issue lives because Obama made transparency an issue in the campaign. Evidently he's not interested in transparency when the light is trained upon HIM.
— Anonymous

I do not support spamming either and believe the appropriate course of action is to have ONE or maybe a FEW "birth certificate" posts and simply vote thumbs up on those if one supports the sentiment … or post comments on the topic but not start new topics. Still, the eligibility question is ultimately part of open government, and if the White House decides the issue is beneath them, they are defeating the purpose of their new Web site.
— Anonymous

I do not find the comments on the open dialogue site to be without merit, even though you might. The responses were absolutely within the parameters of openness. If the president does not have to be open, how can the government be open? It appears Federal Computer Week is staffed by foolish government hacks.
— Pittsburgh

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Wed, Jul 8, 2009 M Washington

I find it interesting that not one birther seems to understand the federal law on citizenship. They all call into question whether Obama was born in the USA, but none call into question who his mother is. It simply does not matter whether he was born in the USA, only that he have a parent that is a US citizen. Birthers do not get this. Even birthers acknowledge that his mother is his mother and by her citizenship Obama becomes a US citizen no matter where he was born. Why don't they understand this simple fact?

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group