DOD wrestles with Web 2.0

Departmentwide social-media review under way

The Defense Department is reviewing its social-media policy amid ongoing security and privacy concerns. The re-evaluation comes soon after an Aug. 3 Marine Corps ban on the use of social-networking sites, made effective immediately.

“We’re addressing the challenges from a security standpoint but also the impact and the value that they have to the department to be able to communicate in a 21st-century environment,” DOD spokesman Bryan Whitman told reporters Aug. 4. Whitman added that the review is part of a directive issued in a July 31 memo from Deputy Defense Secretary William Lynn that called for a study of social-media sites such as Twitter, Facebook and YouTube.

The Marine ban and DOD review are happening even though social media has become a significant force since the 2007 reversal of an initial DOD ban on social-networking sites. Government and the military have become deeply entrenched in social-media tools. Various military and government outfits have hundreds of thousands of Twitter followers and Facebook fans, and access to social-media sites is required on U.S. Army bases.

However, according to the Marine order, “These Internet sites in general are a proven haven for malicious actors and content and are particularly high-risk due to information exposure, user-generated content and targeting by adversaries." The order added that social-networking sites create an easy conduit for information leaks.

However, some assert that a blanket ban on social media isn’t the way to go.

“There certainly are security concerns associated with social networking, but it would be a step back to ban social networks completely,” said information technology security expert Rohyt Belani, a consultant and instructor at Carnegie-Mellon University. “I think there is a middle ground that can be reached.”

That middle ground will require the incorporation of significant security measures. At security giant McAfee, which contracts with DOD and other government and military agencies to provide network security, a comprehensive approach is used to deal with the high-stakes needs of the federal government and military.

“It’s a battle between utility and security — you need to balance both,” said Tom Conway, director of federal business development at McAfee. To meet contractual needs, his company provides advice, tools, products, assessments, deployment of strategies, threat briefings and continuous training as ongoing support to DOD and other military and government clients.

“DOD does need a standard, departmentwide policy,” Conway said, adding that he disagreed with an all-out ban. “The security concerns are real and varied. But you can’t turn back the clock, and you can’t deny progress.”

About the Author

Amber Corrin is a former staff writer for FCW and Defense Systems.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.