The Lectern -- Commentary

How contractors can help agencies save money

The contracting community should work together to find creative ways to meet OMB’s goal of reducing contract spending

The Office of Management and Budget has directed agencies to achieve 3.5 percent savings over their baseline spending on contracts for fiscal 2010 and another 3.5 percent for fiscal 2011. Given the deficit, that is a legitimate request. The contracting community should put on its collective thinking cap to see how we can help make this happen. To get the creative juices flowing, here are a few thoughts.

The easiest way to do this would be to do less with less. If a contract supports a low-priority goal, consider canceling it. However, a dishonest way to meet cost-savings targets would be to bring an activity in-house and count only the savings on the contract without adding the cost of the civil servants who will now be performing the activity.

The creative challenges come in figuring out ways to get more bang for the buck, not just to do less with less.

Let’s start with purchases of commodities. Lower prices can be had by using strategic sourcing — that is, by consolidating purchases with select sellers — to get volume discounts. However, the small-business lobby often opposes that approach. Another option is to use reverse auctions, in which vendors bid on product buys. (Full disclosure: I am on the board of advisers of, a leading provider of reverse-auction services.)

Hotel occupancy is running very low, and discounting is rampant — the average price of a hotel room in New York is down one-third compared to last year — so agencies should be looking for greater discounts on conferences and travel.

And as I have suggested previously in Federal Computer Week (“Beating retail prices,” April 25, 2008), agencies should Google the lowest available online price for commercial products they buy and establish a goal that 95 percent — or even 99 percent — of government prices be lower. When that is not the case, government should find out why and change buying habits accordingly.

New members of the workforce make many of the commodity buys, and we should solicit suggestions for saving cash from the young people buying those items.

Savings on services are more complicated. I bet every agency has recurring requirements that are still bought through cost-reimbursement contracts that, because the requirements are now well understood, could be converted to fixed-price contracts. In other cases, contracts could be split, having a fixed-price core plus time-and-materials line items for unpredictable work.

Contracting folks should be scouring upcoming contract renewals for both kinds of opportunities. Each agency should also pick one or two upcoming high-profile IT services buys for special attention regarding requirements discipline – getting Release 1.0 out without constant requirements changes and evolving requirements afterward.

I am also hopeful the administration will revive the share-in-savings initiative, a big potential cost-saver.

Agencies should involve vendors in these efforts by using draft requests for proposals and other communications to solicit suggestions for changes in agency requirements that would enable significant cost savings without sacrificing much in the way of quality. As an incentive for good suggestions, agencies should give vendors evaluation credit in their proposals for having presented such suggestions earlier.

About the Author

Kelman is professor of public management at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government and former administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy. Connect with him on Twitter: @kelmansteve

Nominate Today!

Nominations for the 2018 Federal 100 Awards are now being accepted, and are due by Dec. 23. 


Reader comments

Fri, Sep 11, 2009 Interested Party

Steve, I like your idea about incentivizing good ideas from potential offerors by giving them evaluation credit. Could you provide some more detail about how you envision this could work? How would you handle someone who offers an idea that presumeably could save money but is impractical to implement? Do you have any idea how this would be approached by GAO in a protest? Great idea, one which I would like to see fleshed out a little.

Fri, Sep 11, 2009 SP Mayor Summit Point, WV

Steve - all good suggestions. One that I think can be easily overlook - really negotiate the contracts, particularly in the services area. I am of the opinion that we have too many 'click & point' awards.Submitting proposals, having non-conversational oral presentations and asking for FRP/BAFO do not represent the best of negotiated procurements. There is a lot of 'bang for the buck' being left on the table for the sake of speed. Good, multiple contractor negotiations are good for the soul and the wallet.Good savings are negotiated, not sterile offerings.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group