Social contract

The world of federal procurement and acquisition policy is about as insular as it gets in nonclassified government. Few people understand it, and fewer still know how to navigate the maze of rules and procedures that govern contracts the government writes to buy things such as weapons systems, lunar landing modules, enterprise software, computers, desks, chairs, telephones and legal pads. (Paper clips, too.)

But if your closed system has difficult and even intractable problems, which the Byzantine procurement process clearly seems to have, it doesn’t really help much to limit the conversation to the people inside your current solar system. Everyone’s stuck in the same orbit. So maybe you should call in an outside consultant? Until a few months ago, that was pretty much your only option.

But as everyone surely knows by now, a new combination of technology tools and social-networking skills, collectively known as Web 2.0, has emerged on the scene to help complete strangers solve problems together. The tools range from open-source software and collaborative wikis to Facebook pages and Twitter feeds, and they have changed the way many people talk to and work with one another.

More importantly, they help you widen the circle of potential experts, which means you can  build on one another’s expertise. Who knows? Maybe there’s someone out there buried deep in the bowels of an obscure federal agency who’s already found a better way to buy a mousetrap. And maybe he or she has a Facebook account.

That’s the premise of a burgeoning round of discussions taking place today in the acquisition community, which has begun adapting those same social-media tools to their own disruptive uses. They call it Acquisition 2.0.

Staff writer Matthew Weigelt, who has been covering the acquisition beat for Federal Computer Week since 2006, writes in this week’s cover story that senior officials in the White House, OMB and the General Services Administration are actively seeking help from across the federal government — even the general public — in an effort to break through the acquisition chokehold of inefficiency, lack of accountability and uncontrolled costs.

Hundreds of eager acquisition geeks are already participating, and some fresh new ideas are already bubbling up. It might not be long before they get the rest of us to join their expanding and expansive club.

About the Author

David Rapp is editor-in-chief of Federal Computer Week and VP of content for 1105 Government Information Group.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.

Featured

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1996, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

  • Shutterstock image.

    Merged IT modernization bill punts on funding

    A House panel approved a new IT modernization bill that appears poised to pass, but key funding questions are left for appropriators.

  • General Frost

    Army wants cyber capability everywhere

    The Army's cyber director said cyber, electronic warfare and information operations must be integrated into warfighters' doctrine and training.

  • Rising Star 2013

    Meet the 2016 Rising Stars

    FCW honors 30 early-career leaders in federal IT.

Reader comments

Fri, Oct 23, 2009 Peter G. Tuttle, CPCM

Being called a acquisition geek is a compliment - right? Anyway, Matthew's article is "spot-on" and more folks need to engage in the ongoing discourse surrounding the federal acquisition process. Why? If you pay taxes - you're paying for the goods and services that are being purchased by the Federal government. Besides, you never know who will see and pick up on a comment. Your suggestion or idea may very well make a difference on how business is conducted in support of our Nations' governing process.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group