Assessing a training program

NIST Special Publication 800-16 recommends four ways to evaluate the effectiveness of a cybersecurity training program

The National Institute of Standards and Technology's Special Publication 800-16 recommends four ways to evaluate the effectiveness of a cybersecurity training program.

Level 1: End-of-Course Evaluations (Student Satisfaction). Those evaluations obtain instant feedback from students who use forms that rate the training facility, instructor and presentation method, among other factors.

Level 2: Behavior Objective Testing (Learning and Teaching Effectiveness). This level seeks to measure the degree to which a training activity transfers information to the student — for example, by administering tests before and after the training.

Level 3: Job Transfer Skills (Student Performance Effectiveness). An evaluator polls supervisors 30 days to 60 days after training to see whether employees are meeting the behavioral objectives of the program.

Level 4: Organizational Benefit (Training Program Effectiveness). This level seeks to quantify the value of the resulting security improvements in relation to the cost of the training.

About the Author

John Moore is a freelance writer based in Syracuse, N.Y.


  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.