Nobel Prize-worthy economic theory has lessons worth learning for federal IT

An award-winning economic theory offers insight into three important federal IT trends

Warren Suss is president of Suss Consulting, a federal IT consulting firm headquartered in Jenkintown, Pa.

The thinking of a Nobel Prize-winning economist could help all of us in the federal information technology field deliver better, faster solutions for government workers, warfighters and citizens.

Oliver Williamson, who won the Nobel Prize last year, was one of my professors when I was in grad school. I’ve kept in touch with him over the years because his work on transaction cost economics was one of the handful of things I learned in grad school that is still relevant to my day-to-day work.

Williamson begins with three core concepts that fit our environment well:

  • Uncertainty. In federal IT, changing technologies, user demands and operational environments create uncertainty everywhere we turn.
  • Bounded rationality. There are inherent limits to our ability to write contracts that anticipate all contingencies.
  • Opportunism. In an environment characterized by uncertainty and bounded rationality, players on both sides can behave badly.

We can apply Williamson’s framework to three important federal IT trends: insourcing, the shift to fixed-priced contracting and the breakup of large contracts, which I call segmentation.

Trend 1: Insourcing

Many agencies are offering on-site contractor employees a deal they can’t refuse: Either quit your contractor job and join the government or you’re out of a job altogether.

From Williamson's perspective, insourcing's potential payoff is the ability to save on transaction costs associated with managing large, complex IT projects and operations. Why? Because in the federal IT space, when transaction costs go up, success rates on IT projects go down. And IT has become the primary tool for maximizing the productivity and effectiveness of the federal government.

To achieve insourcing's benefits, we need to go beyond simply giving workers a different ID badge. Instead, we should focus new, insourced resources on improving IT governance. That approach should allow us to respond more rapidly and flexibly to emerging user requirements, achieve the benefits of promising new technologies sooner, move with greater speed and agility to address operational problems, and redirect IT projects in trouble.

Trend 2: The shift from time-and-materials to fixed-price contracts

The challenges of moving to fixed pricing can be addressed with strategies that reduce transaction costs on both the government and industry sides. Unfortunately, many agencies have embraced multiple-award indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contracting without appreciating the importance of providing better data to help industry generate more accurate demand forecasts. Likewise, companies can compete by doing a better, clearer job of defining what they’ll deliver for a fixed price.

Trend 3: The breakup of large IT contracts

Segmentation creates new interfaces between the government and contractors. With more interfaces come more challenges and more chances for opportunistic behavior. The key to success will be improved governance to enable successful interactions among all players. The government also needs to make major progress in governing its fragmented user and IT management communities, and industry must help the government deploy that framework.

If government and industry leaders adopt these lessons from Williamson, the winners will be the federal workers, warfighters and people who rely on technology to help our nation thrive.

About the Author

Warren Suss is president of Suss Consulting, a federal IT consulting firm headquartered in Jenkintown, Pa.

The Fed 100

Save the date for 28th annual Federal 100 Awards Gala.

Featured

  • computer network

    How Einstein changes the way government does business

    The Department of Commerce is revising its confidentiality agreement for statistical data survey respondents to reflect the fact that the Department of Homeland Security could see some of that data if it is captured by the Einstein system.

  • Defense Secretary Jim Mattis. Army photo by Monica King. Jan. 26, 2017.

    Mattis mulls consolidation in IT, cyber

    In a Feb. 17 memo, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis told senior leadership to establish teams to look for duplication across the armed services in business operations, including in IT and cybersecurity.

  • Image from Shutterstock.com

    DHS vague on rules for election aid, say states

    State election officials had more questions than answers after a Department of Homeland Security presentation on the designation of election systems as critical U.S. infrastructure.

  • Org Chart Stock Art - Shutterstock

    How the hiring freeze targets millennials

    The government desperately needs younger talent to replace an aging workforce, and experts say that a freeze on hiring doesn't help.

  • Shutterstock image: healthcare digital interface.

    VA moves ahead with homegrown scheduling IT

    The Department of Veterans Affairs will test an internally developed scheduling module at primary care sites nationwide to see if it's ready to service the entire agency.

  • Shutterstock images (honglouwawa & 0beron): Bitcoin image overlay replaced with a dollar sign on a hardware circuit.

    MGT Act poised for a comeback

    After missing in the last Congress, drafters of a bill to encourage cloud adoption are looking for a new plan.

Reader comments

Sun, Apr 25, 2010 Stan Vornovitsky

The argument threading through Oliver Williamson's numerous works is that every organizational structure exists to economize on transaction costs. The article appears to suggest that keeping those "large, complex IT projects and operations" in contractor's hands is inefficient from the transaction-cost standpoint. Applying Williamson's framework to government contracting can then lead to one simple question: Why would those projects EVER be contracted out in the first place? The article also makes an implicit assumption that contracting out is associated with greater transaction costs, which is not at all certain...

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group