Gates details plans to slash DOD budget

Joint Forces Command, other major DOD offices face elimination

Defense Secretary Robert Gates today elaborated on plans to shave $100 billion from the defense budget over the next five years, and on the chopping block are a number of areas of Defense Department information technology infrastructure and offices.

“All of our bases, operational headquarters and defense agencies have their own IT infrastructures, processes and application-ware,” Gates said at a Pentagon press conference. “This decentralized approach results in large cumulative costs, and a patchwork of capabilities that create cyber vulnerabilities and limit our ability to capitalize on the promise of information technology.”

Beyond IT, Gates is targeting a number of DOD offices and organizations, including one major command. Among his proposed moves:

  • Reduce funding for support contractor personnel by 10 percent a year for the next three years.
  • Close the offices of the assistant secretary of defense for network intelligence and integration and the Joint Staff’s section for command, control, communications and computer systems.
  • Eliminate the Business Transformation Agency.
  • Recommend elimination of Joint Forces Command.
  • Freeze at fiscal 2010 levels the number of Office of the Secretary of Defense, defense agency and combatant command positions for the next three years; Gates said this is a first step in examining leadership organizations.
  • Freeze at fiscal 2010 levels the number of senior DOD officials; Gates will appoint a senior task force to assess the number of general and flag officers, senior executive service employees and political appointees.
  • Increase use of common IT functions to mitigate disparate, decentralized IT systems throughout DOD that result in cumulative costs and cyber vulnerabilities.
  • Freeze the overall number of required oversight reports and cut by a quarter the money allocated for such reports.
  • Eliminate DOD boards and commissions that have outlived their usefulness and cut funding to such boards by 25 percent,
  • Reduce by 10 percent funding for intelligence advisory and assistance contracts, freeze the number of senior executive service positions in the DOD intelligence apparatus and end needless intell duplication.

Gates said operational functions of offices proposed for closring “will be assigned to other organizations, and most of their acquisition functions will transfer to acquisition, technology and logistics.”

These steps are part of Gates’ attempt to trim the inefficiencies inside DOD, as his department faces the prospect of having less funding than the Obama administration is planning to give him.

Related stories:

Gates aims to slash budget by $100B to pay for war

“To be clear, the task before us is not to reduce the department’s top-line budget,” Gates said, according to a news report. “Rather, it is to significantly reduce its excess overhead costs and apply the savings to force structure and modernization.”

Reactions from Congress were mixed.

“I support any responsible shift of funds from overhead costs in order to strengthen the efforts of our brave troops,” said Rep. Ike Skelton (D-Mo.), chairman of the House Armed Services Committee.

However, Skelton warned Gates against going too far with the cuts. He urged the secretary to carefully analyze what gets cut.

“There are many functions within the department that are critical to our nation’s defense,” Skelton said. He’s already preparing for a committee hearing on Gate’s cost-cutting proposal after Congress’ August recess.

Rep. Randy Forbes (R-Va.), ranking member of the Armed Services Committee's Readiness Subcommittee, was upset that DOD is forced to find cuts because of the administration’s other budgetary priorities.

“Under the cover of night, this administration is selling off our military at auction to pay for its social programs,” he said today. Forbes  said this is the beginning of a long string of national defense cuts as the money goes to other priorities.

About the Authors

Amber Corrin is a former staff writer for FCW and Defense Systems.

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Shutterstock image: looking for code.

    How DOD embraced bug bounties -- and how your agency can, too

    Hack the Pentagon proved to Defense Department officials that outside hackers can be assets, not adversaries.

  • Shutterstock image: cyber defense.

    Why PPD-41 is evolutionary, not revolutionary

    Government cybersecurity officials say the presidential policy directive codifies cyber incident response protocols but doesn't radically change what's been in practice in recent years.

  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

Reader comments

Thu, Mar 31, 2011

can we cut Gates job first.

Fri, Aug 13, 2010

Does anyone know/ think about how this will effect small/ minoirty owned business?!

Wed, Aug 11, 2010 c The future

Sometimes technology is not the answer. In many cases having more office staff would resolve information issues. Office staff are inexpensive and don't require a project manager. All of world war II was administered without computers. Something is still required to check data quality. Computer and software design will continue to evolve faster than you can design a big system and patch it. Do the basic numbers and data communication with computers. Do the rest with staff until the computer industry evolves a couple more times. In 5 to 7 years we should see the fruits of todays programming automation and cloud services. I'm not saying just sit on your thumbs and wait. Get your data quality, data reliability and workflows mapped out. Programming will be easier in a few years.

Wed, Aug 11, 2010 c ca

There are GIS initiatives in the southwest, modeled after the GIS work that was done by DOD for alabama after katrina. Perhaps incorporate some of this technical data model or infrastructure into the plan.

Wed, Aug 11, 2010 Ken Carrigan VA

I diddo John Griffith's comments exactly. Over Navy Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI) computers are worthless except to get emails and Web. That's it. Otherwise I work on an Out-Of-Scope computer to do real engineering work. Get rid of EDS, and give us back productivity for the masses! Save Billions that way!

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group