DOD has $1.7B worth of errors in data on Recovery.gov, IG says

DOD did not conduct adequate internal reviews of data quality: IG report

The spending reports the Defense Department submitted to Recovery.gov contained $1.7 billion worth of errors and questionable data, according to a report from the department’s Office of Inspector General.

In the 2009 economic stimulus law, Congress dedicated $7.4 billion to DOD for energy conservation, modernization, construction, environmental restoration, facilities maintenance and other programs. As part of the law, DOD had to follow specific rules for setting up internal controls and reporting expenditures to the Recovery.gov website, which allows the public to monitor how agencies spend stimulus funding.

However, DOD deviated from those rules, wrote Patricia Marsh, assistant IG for financial management and reporting, in the report dated March 23. As of Dec. 31, 2009, DOD “did not have adequate controls in place to ensure that recipient data was accurate and significant errors were identified and corrected,” Marsh wrote.


Related stories:

Recovery.gov finds new home in the cloud

Retooled Recovery.gov site praised, panned


Since then, the department has established an effective plan for quality reviews of data, but it does not have procedures in place to monitor contracting or processes for fiscal officers to review the data, the report states.

“As a result, 1,943 recipient reports with a total award amount of $1.7 billion contained 2,914 discrepancies on key award information,” Marsh wrote. Because of the inaccurate data, DOD did not provide adequate transparency and accountability to the public, she added.

The IG’s office made three recommendations to the deputy undersecretary of Defense:

  • Establish a quality assurance plan, with monitoring, to ensure that recipient data is reported completely, accurately and in a timely fashion.
  • Establish policies and procedures for employees who perform quality control reviews and monitor contracting and fiscal officer data reviews.
  • Require periodic assessments of data quality reviews.

DOD executives agreed with the recommendations, adding that they planned to have implemented them by March 15.

About the Author

Alice Lipowicz is a staff writer covering government 2.0, homeland security and other IT policies for Federal Computer Week.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.

Featured

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1996, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

  • Shutterstock image.

    Merged IT modernization bill punts on funding

    A House panel approved a new IT modernization bill that appears poised to pass, but key funding questions are left for appropriators.

  • General Frost

    Army wants cyber capability everywhere

    The Army's cyber director said cyber, electronic warfare and information operations must be integrated into warfighters' doctrine and training.

  • Rising Star 2013

    Meet the 2016 Rising Stars

    FCW honors 30 early-career leaders in federal IT.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group