Committee finds manual processes in automated systems

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee said Sept. 6 that federal agencies frequently use manual processes to transfer information between their IT management systems.

“Our analysis shows these systems are not serving taxpayers well,” said Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), chairman of the house oversight and government reform committee.

The committee asked 26 agencies in March for information on their IT management systems. It wanted to know about the interaction among the management systems that agencies use to track financial and accounting data and information on grants and contracts.

An analysis of the responses by the committee staff found many agencies' systems often don’t interact directly.

“Agencies employ a tangled web of disparate manual processes to generate the data,” noted the committee.

Of the responses, 21 of 26 agencies said there is the widespread use of manual processes in their reporting systems. For example, the Interior Department uses manual processes in almost every step of its financial reporting. And the Veterans Affairs Department established the Data Quality Service to help manually transfer information between systems, the committee said.

Manual processes are inherently problematic, because they are slow, expensive, and conducive to human error, the committee said. However, agencies did not report significant strides in getting rid of manual processing, based on their responses to the committee inquiry.

The committee also raised concerns about a lack of financial information that goes online, particularly the data tracked by the management IT systems.

The committee said it did not receive sufficient answers from at least 10 of the 26 agencies to questions on the public availability of management IT data. Even so, some agencies went into detail about their IT management systems.

Some agencies said they do not make any financial information public. For example, the Transportation Department does not publicly report any of its grants, loans, or contracts, the committee found.

Nevertheless, a few agencies make management IT data publicly available on their own websites.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Tue, Sep 20, 2011

Obviously this committee thinks there is a strain of killer apps out there in the public domain that are naturally occurring fully automated systems that require no human intervention and feature high data quality. This notion completely ignores the question of how such systems get fed the data they need, if not by human action. They must think these systems just spring forth from the soil and cost next to nothing.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group