Are you a fed? Please stay.

Federal human resources officials' top worry for 2012 is how they will keep high-performing federal employees during a time of pay freezes and shrinking employee benefits, according to a Federal News Radio survey.

Employee retention topped the list of concerns, even above the ability to hire new people, upgrading technology or program budget cuts.

However, be warned that the sample size is small -- only 10 people responded to the survey, according to the article. 

About the Author

Connect with the FCW staff on Twitter @FCWnow.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.

Featured

  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Thu, Dec 29, 2011 Obvious but overlooked

Lets not foget the big problem are Congressional Representatives that choose interests based on party affiliation verses what is good for all americans. Our Congressional Representatives should be held accountable or we vote them out. However, what happens is our representatives do very little for us. Then when its election time, they run adds to convince us the other person is wrong for us. Well some of our federal workers mimic the work ethics of our elected officials. If we want change, we should not continue to elect the same congressional leaders for decades and expect a difference in leadership.

Fri, Dec 23, 2011 Voice of Reason All across America

The Federal Human Resources Executives in this survey are concerned about both the short term and long term effects the current congressional politicking will have on recruitment and retention. Unfortunately few, if any, of our Congressional Representatives are able to envision the long term detrimental effects they are causing. It is clear that our government is in a serious financial crisis and certainly some reasonable steps need to be taken to rein in the problem. It is reasonable however to single out the workforce for cuts that save 2 or 3 billion while refusing to consider cuts of hundreds of billions in pork barrel boondoggles? The constant vilification of the Federal Workforce does nothing to help the situation and is likely to make things worse in the long run.

Fri, Dec 23, 2011

Pay cuts and hiring freezes have adverse long term effects. The best are no longer attracted, or leave, while the substandard are all that is available to the hiring manager. This just sets the stage for future problems and ends up costing more: if you have substandard performers, as soon as you get funding, you need to hire more; and significant management time is wasted trying to correct the mistakes of, motivate and train poorly qualified employees and dealing with the complaints of unequal treatment by the non-performers. We pick the best available candidate, but are we picking from the bottom, middle or top third of the class?

Thu, Dec 22, 2011 Interested Party

They are right to be concerned. Annecdotal evidence is already showing retirement numbers are up significantly. Wait 'till you see what happens if the pay freeze is extended.

Thu, Dec 22, 2011 Fedup Fed

The salary freeze is the complely wrong approach. Those with just a few years in the government with current skills and are willing to relocate will leave. Those with 35 years in the government will stay because they are from a generation where their work is their identity. Those who were promoted to a grade far exceeding their skill level will stay. GSA needs to make it easier for non-performers to be removed without collecting years of paperwork, and to make it easier for desk audits so people are paid according to the required skills for their position. (this includes management) Also do away with Unions for any white collar position above grade 11 or equivalent. The Unions have their place, but not with the higher grades where individuals are expected to have strong communication skills. Arbitration could be used instead. The Unions like to include the higher grades to leverage they represent a huge body of employees, eventhough only a small portion of those employees pay dues to the Union.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group