GSA sees air travel savings in new City Pair arrangement

The General Services Administration’s negotiating efforts lowered airline ticket prices for the government for 2013, potentially yielding an estimated $5.9 billion in savings per year, the agency reported Aug. 9.

Officials pre-negotiated the airline rates for the City Pairs program, and they expect to offer federal employees up to 73 percent off commercial airfare prices. The 2013 rates will become effective Oct. 1.

In June, GSA awarded a 15-year, $1.4 billion contract to launch the next generation of the government’s web-based travel management service to Concur Technologies. GSA’s E-gov Travel Service is a cloud-based service that more than 90 agencies use for travel booking and expense management. It’s the backbone of GSA’s governmentwide managed travel programs.

The next generation ETS2 will build upon the original service. It will help agencies consolidate online travel booking services and expense management platforms.

The City Pairs program also makes booking flights easier. All major U.S. carriers participate in the City Pairs program, and the program gives federal travelers the flexibility to book one-way, multi-leg, and round-trip airfare at the lowest cost possible. The program also offers dual fare markets to provide flexibility for immediate travel and discounted fares for booking flights early. Federal employees can cancel or adjust flights at no additional cost to the government as well.

Mary Davie, acting Federal Acquisition Service commissioner, chalked up the good prices to good purchasing strategies.

“By leveraging the government’s buying power, we are able to maximize cost-savings for federal agencies and save taxpayer dollars,” Davie said.

The government spent nearly $3 billion on air travel in fiscal 2011.

GSA is able to work out best-value pricing by using government travel data, the agency said. 

In January, the GSA inspector general’s office reported that FAS could improve City Pair to potentially save an additional $35.2 million based on recent years' travel spending numbers. GSA could save as much as $11 million if it increased competition among airlines. The agency could save $24.2 million if it eliminated the traveler's option of choosing between dual fares when they can get lower contract fares. In addition, the IG reported that GSA struggles with a lack of comprehensive data. Officials could improve the program by analyzing that data and using better performance benchmarks, according to the report.

GSA first awarded City Pair contracts in 1980, and they originally covered only 11 markets. They have expanded to over 5,000 markets in the last 30 years. In fiscal 2011, FAS awarded contracts to 13 carriers.

FAS officials agreed with the report's findings.

Today, officials said they considered a number of criteria for the City Pair program, including availability of nonstop service, total number of flights, flight availability, average elapsed flight time, and price of service.

 

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

The Fed 100

Save the date for 28th annual Federal 100 Awards Gala.

Featured

  • computer network

    How Einstein changes the way government does business

    The Department of Commerce is revising its confidentiality agreement for statistical data survey respondents to reflect the fact that the Department of Homeland Security could see some of that data if it is captured by the Einstein system.

  • Defense Secretary Jim Mattis. Army photo by Monica King. Jan. 26, 2017.

    Mattis mulls consolidation in IT, cyber

    In a Feb. 17 memo, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis told senior leadership to establish teams to look for duplication across the armed services in business operations, including in IT and cybersecurity.

  • Image from Shutterstock.com

    DHS vague on rules for election aid, say states

    State election officials had more questions than answers after a Department of Homeland Security presentation on the designation of election systems as critical U.S. infrastructure.

  • Org Chart Stock Art - Shutterstock

    How the hiring freeze targets millennials

    The government desperately needs younger talent to replace an aging workforce, and experts say that a freeze on hiring doesn't help.

  • Shutterstock image: healthcare digital interface.

    VA moves ahead with homegrown scheduling IT

    The Department of Veterans Affairs will test an internally developed scheduling module at primary care sites nationwide to see if it's ready to service the entire agency.

  • Shutterstock images (honglouwawa & 0beron): Bitcoin image overlay replaced with a dollar sign on a hardware circuit.

    MGT Act poised for a comeback

    After missing in the last Congress, drafters of a bill to encourage cloud adoption are looking for a new plan.

Reader comments

Wed, Oct 17, 2012

The scary thing about this program is that they are using it to prop up American Airlines by giving them a bunch of routes that United used to have. Given the work slowdown, widespread cancellation of American's flights and seats falling apart, why is the USG requiring its employees to fly an airline that has a margin ability to operate

Tue, Aug 21, 2012

If a govt traveler were to provide insight/feedback about observed/experienced TSA operations while traveling, the TSA could be required to reimberse travel dollars (to be determined) to the travelers unit. This action might get TSA to rely less on public input and just may enhance travel security.

Thu, Aug 16, 2012

I think the fares should be to all flights. Meaning if you are a government travelor any flights out there should automatically deduct whatever percentage deem, or build a dabase that will find the lowest flights period

Wed, Aug 15, 2012

Good negotiating job, now why do feds still have to pay for checked luggage? Ever been required t travel to a conference for 5 days and not have a checked bag? $25 a pop savings can add up.

Mon, Aug 13, 2012

" The agency could save $24.2 million if it eliminated the traveler's option of choosing between dual fares when they can get lower contract fares. "

Hmmm… I can save $150 by using a contract flight that takes me to another city for a three hour layover and adds about 4 hours to my travel time. So to save that $150 I have to spend an extra $480 in travel time for a net loss of $330. But it still is saving money. Can someone smarter than me explain this???

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group