Sequestration pushing agencies toward shared services

illustration dollar sign in vise

Sequestration is not just a source of pain for federal IT and financial leaders. It's changing the way they think about managing their agency operations, particularly information technology, in ways that could lead to long-term strategic changes, according to speakers at the 2013 Federal CIO-CFO Summit in Washington, D.C.

That rethinking is pushing technologies and services deeper into federal agencies that are pulling greater benefits from a continually shrinking pool of technology funding, they said. Shared services -- where one agency provides a service such as email, human resources applications or financial analysis to other agencies -- are offering federal IT managers, as well as financial officers, more efficient options.

Sequestration, however, has also played a role in advancing those services, they said, by forcing agencies to get a better handle on costs.

"Sequestration hasn't changed the partnership" between federal CIOs and CFOs, said Mark Easton, deputy chief financial officer at the Defense Department. "It has made budget constraints severe but it has also provided some real opportunities."

Those opportunities include the impetus to take a very close look at information systems, consolidation and new ways to get the same job done for less money, he said.

Defense Department CIO Teresa Takai expanded the point. "Sequestration has focused on how to reduce administrative costs, including IT costs. How do you do it without impacting the mission? DOD spent [funds] in a decentralized way for IT. That could mean a lot of redundancy. We have to work more closely with the CFO to understand where the money is."

The CIOs and CFOs at the conference said that shared services -- along with cloud computing and virtualization -- can help agencies eliminate redundancies and consolidate to better use limited resources. Casey Coleman, GSA CIO, said her agency is a provider of such services, naming travel and purchase cards and telecommunications services as examples of GSA services for other agencies.

GSA, however, is also setting up shared services internally in its IT department, bringing all IT capabilities into a single office, she said. According to Coleman, the consolidation involves four GSA IT offices that had their own support systems, including procurement and operations. The move will consolidate all of that, making resources more consistent, while adding transparency and allowing the agency to see across its internal IT portfolio more evenly, she said.

Additionally, Coleman said GSA has developed and is using an "IT Spend Tracker" capability that allows it to keep a tally of what devices and gear it has purchased, "not to stop spending, but to keep track of it." The capability, said Coleman, has been in use almost a year at the agency. The idea, she added, is to get a better idea of the economies of scale and analysis of where its IT money is going.

Although shared services can change how agencies use and track IT, its biggest impact, said Simon Szykman, CIO at the Commerce Department, is on an agency's culture and people. Consolidating data centers and moving capabilities elsewhere could mean a tough future for workers. Agencies should make contingency plans for the workers that will be affected by the adoption of shared services or other new capabilities.

In the end, Takai said, the mindset is not about the specific technology, but about taking advantage of what the technology can do.

About the Author

Mark Rockwell is a staff writer at FCW.

Before joining FCW, Rockwell was Washington correspondent for Government Security News, where he covered all aspects of homeland security from IT to detection dogs and border security. Over the last 25 years in Washington as a reporter, editor and correspondent, he has covered an increasingly wide array of high-tech issues for publications like Communications Week, Internet Week, Fiber Optics News, magazine and Wireless Week.

Rockwell received a Jesse H. Neal Award for his work covering telecommunications issues, and is a graduate of James Madison University.

Click here for previous articles by Rockwell. Contact him at or follow him on Twitter at @MRockwell4.

The Fed 100

Read the profiles of all this year's winners.


  • Then-presidential candidate Donald Trump at a 2016 campaign event. Image: Shutterstock

    'Buy American' order puts procurement in the spotlight

    Some IT contractors are worried that the "buy American" executive order from President Trump could squeeze key innovators out of the market.

  • OMB chief Mick Mulvaney, shown here in as a member of Congress in 2013. (Photo credit Gage Skidmore/Flickr)

    White House taps old policies for new government makeover

    New guidance from OMB advises agencies to use shared services, GWACs and federal schedules for acquisition, and to leverage IT wherever possible in restructuring plans.

  • Shutterstock image (by Everett Historical): aerial of the Pentagon.

    What DOD's next CIO will have to deal with

    It could be months before the Defense Department has a new CIO, and he or she will face a host of organizational and operational challenges from Day One

  • USAF Gen. John Hyten

    General: Cyber Command needs new platform before NSA split

    U.S. Cyber Command should be elevated to a full combatant command as soon as possible, the head of Strategic Command told Congress, but it cannot be separated from the NSA until it has its own cyber platform.

  • Image from Shutterstock.

    DLA goes virtual

    The Defense Logistics Agency is in the midst of an ambitious campaign to eliminate its IT infrastructure and transition to using exclusively shared, hosted and virtual services.

  • Fed 100 logo

    The 2017 Federal 100

    The women and men who make up this year's Fed 100 are proof positive of what one person can make possibile in federal IT. Read on to learn more about each and every winner's accomplishments.

Reader comments

Fri, Jun 7, 2013 FromMyWindow

Isn't it interesting what survivalist people become when money begins to dry up. At Takai's level the questions are not about the specifics though they certainly will be when implementation time rolls around. This is about an IT apparatus and bureaucracy that has grown from nothing to something in the past 50 plus years: Change is not free and real offsets are exceedinlgy scarce.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group