Acquisition

CBP offers 'explanation plus' to losing bidders

FAR image GSA

Customs and Border Protection's IT technology acquisition operation is developing ways to help explain to unsuccessful contract bidders why they lost out to competitors, according to the agency's top IT acquisition official.

In remarks at a presentation on acquisition and programming at FOSE in Washington, D.C., Guy Torres, CBP director of IT contracting, said he and his legal team had developed an "explanation plus" document to provide more information to vendors bidding under Federal Acquisition Regulation. The FAR can restrict providing explicit information on some bids to vendors. Torres said he wanted to provide some information to help vendors understand why they may have lost, instead of providing only a short statement that they didn't get a contract.

The "explanation plus" document, Torres told FCW, was done "on the fly" the week of May 5 to help frustrated bidders trying to get more information on why they weren't selected for a particular IT contract under the FAR. The document, he said, provided a modicum of information to the vendors that “helped lessen the blow, but we still got a protest."

In his FOSE presentation, Torres noted that he helped establish an acquisition acceleration center where CBP's programming and procurement staffs can work together to make contracting more efficient.

When he came on board in 2011, Torres said, contracting at CBP was an inefficient, sometimes chaotic and inordinately lengthy process. By bringing the programming and procurement staff together at the acquisition center, the agency has wrung $80 million in savings from more closely tailoring contract types, renegotiating contracts and breaking larger contracts into more efficient smaller contracts, he said.

About the Author

Mark Rockwell is a staff writer at FCW.

Before joining FCW, Rockwell was Washington correspondent for Government Security News, where he covered all aspects of homeland security from IT to detection dogs and border security. Over the last 25 years in Washington as a reporter, editor and correspondent, he has covered an increasingly wide array of high-tech issues for publications like Communications Week, Internet Week, Fiber Optics News, tele.com magazine and Wireless Week.

Rockwell received a Jesse H. Neal Award for his work covering telecommunications issues, and is a graduate of James Madison University.

Click here for previous articles by Rockwell. Contact him at mrockwell@fcw.com or follow him on Twitter at @MRockwell4.


The Fed 100

Read the profiles of all this year's winners.

Featured

  • Shutterstock image (by wk1003mike): cloud system fracture.

    Does the IRS have a cloud strategy?

    Congress and watchdog agencies have dinged the IRS for lacking an enterprise cloud strategy seven years after it became the official policy of the U.S. government.

  • Shutterstock image: illuminated connections between devices.

    Who won what in EIS

    The General Services Administration posted detailed data on how the $50 billion Enterprise Infrastructure Solutions contract might be divvied up.

  • Wikimedia Image: U.S. Cyber Command logo.

    Trump elevates CyberCom to combatant command status

    The White House announced a long-planned move to elevate Cyber Command to the status of a full combatant command.

  • Photo credit: John Roman Images / Shutterstock.com

    Verizon plans FirstNet rival

    Verizon says it will carve a dedicated network out of its extensive national 4G LTE network for first responders, in competition with FirstNet.

  • AI concept art

    Can AI tools replace feds?

    The Heritage Foundation is recommending that hundreds of thousands of federal jobs be replaced by automation as part of a larger government reorganization strategy.

  • DOD Common Access Cards

    DOD pushes toward CAC replacement

    Defense officials hope the Common Access Card's days are numbered as they continue to test new identity management solutions.

Reader comments

Tue, May 13, 2014

These types of written debriefs don't go far enough to fully explain the award decision. A letter can't answer the additional questions that vendors are going to have. In-person debriefs with the acquisition team would probably have prevented the protest. It's time consuming, but so is the protest. CBP should know that debriefs give vendors insight into their proposal performance so that they can improve, not just ease their hurt feelings.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group