Blog archive

The dangers of checklists


Improving the acquisition workforce is a key component of Better Buying Power 2.0, but a reader cautions against a compiance-based approach. (Stock image)

To our story on DOD's Better Buying initiative, a reader wrote: I think the government bureaucracy has lost the forest while looking at the trees. Contracts that used to recognize a rough order of magnitude for minutiae now require burdensome justification. (Requiring an itemized list of screws needed in a research assembly… absolutely absurd!) The contracting agent is now happy that his little checklist has all the necessary checks… while the cost of bidding is going up exponentially driven by the inflation of the paperwork!

We need government people who can think, not bean counters looking at an acquisition check-off list.

Amber Corrin responds: Great points – and complaints I hear about frequently from government contractors. I think this ties in with a culture of oversight that focuses on check-the-box approaches to a number of government activities, including acquisition and cybersecurity.

Ashton Carter, deputy defense secretary, and Frank Kendall, under secretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics, both addressed this idea at the Center for Strategic and International Studies last week, in the event that occasioned our earlier story. They noted that tackling the oversight-heavy approach to acquisition is a top priority in the Better Buying Power reform efforts.

Kendall said he's "waging a continuing war against non-value added activities" – sounds like excessive checklists might be among those – and that officials want to take that burden off managers and return them to what they should be doing.

"I share industry's concern about an excessive oversight culture. I've long been concerned that the number of watchers was approaching the number of doers in the department," Carter said. "We may in fact be reaching that threshold, especially with respect to things like audits. And we're trying to work internally and work with industry to address these issues."

Posted by Amber Corrin on May 28, 2013 at 12:10 PM

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Shutterstock image: looking for code.

    How DOD embraced bug bounties -- and how your agency can, too

    Hack the Pentagon proved to Defense Department officials that outside hackers can be assets, not adversaries.

  • Shutterstock image: cyber defense.

    Why PPD-41 is evolutionary, not revolutionary

    Government cybersecurity officials say the presidential policy directive codifies cyber incident response protocols but doesn't radically change what's been in practice in recent years.

  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group