Grkavac: No need to turn back time

The SARA panel is proposing a new roll of red tape that would tie up recent procurement reforms.

Industry applauds lawmakers for passing SARA, and we support the effort to further streamline procurement regulations. We understand the desire for checks and balances that prevent waste, fraud and abuse in government contracting. Yet the government must ensure that those good intentions do not lead us back to the days when officials were forced to craft government-unique purchasing requirements and avoid the readily available and less-costly commercially available options.

Acquisition Advisory Panel

If you think that the government procurement process is bad now, just remember what it was like about 10 years ago. Major information technology acquisitions took so long that solutions were outdated before work began. Only companies that specialized in federal contracting would try to compete for contracts, and award protests routinely delayed performance after contracts were awarded. That was before legislation such as the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 and the Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996 launched a movement to reform regulations so the government could use the same products and services that corporations took advantage of every day.

So the news was welcome in 2003 when another law, the Services Acquisition Reform Act (SARA), called for a high-level panel to review acquisition laws and regulations “for the effective, efficient and fair award and administration of contracts for the acquisition by the federal government of goods and services.” Unfortunately, after months of deliberations, it has become clear that this panel has lost its way.

Earlier this month, the panel adopted a series of preliminary recommendations that would reverse the momentum of reform. If the Bush administration and Congress adopt those recommendations, they would limit the government’s access to cutting-edge solutions, encourage frivolous post-award protests and restrict the government’s ability to use common commercial contracting tools such as time-and-materials agreements. The net result would be to impose a procurement process that is less efficient, less effective and less fair to all stakeholders involved. Such an environment does not serve the best interests of the federal government, its industry partners or, most importantly, American taxpayers.

For those reasons, a coalition of the major trade associations representing the private sector in its business with the federal government has denounced the panel’s recommendations. Coalition members include the Information Technology Association of America, the Professional Services Council, the Contract Services Association, the Aerospace Industries Association, the National Defense Industrial Association and the Government Electronics and Information Technology Association.

Together, we submitted comments identifying numerous flaws and weaknesses in the government panel’s recommendations. It is also important to note that we all worked — in vain — to inform the panel during its deliberations on several occasions through comments and presentations.

Here are a few of the most egregious examples of how the panel’s recommendations could negatively affect government procurement.

  • The panel recommends that the definition of commercial services be restricted to services that are “actually sold in substantial quantities in the commercial marketplace.” Currently, the government can procure solutions that are “of a type” commonly sold commercially. If enacted, that recommendation would doom the government to acquiring only the older generations in any category of solution — an unacceptable restraint, particularly as the government grapples with evolving national and homeland security risks. It would also significantly hamper the government’s ability to drive innovation in the United States as one of the world’s largest consumers of technology.

  • The panel also suggests that companies that fail to win business under multiple-award contracts be allowed to protest any award decision. This is a bad solution intended to fix a nonexistent problem: We are unaware of anyone in industry or government advocating expanded protest rights for those types of offerings. This move would ultimately cost taxpayers and hurt the government’s ability to get the contracted work accomplished on schedule.

  • The panel advocates policies that would restrict the use of time-and-materials contracts, a form of agreement commonly used in the private sector. The panel recommended that existing time-and-materials contracts be converted and that they only be permitted when the work to be performed under the agreement can be described in detail at the time of the agreement. Because such contracts are used in cases when the government and its industry partners cannot fully predict what work will be performed, such requirements do not make sense. Converting existing time-and-materials work can be tricky for the same reason.

As the panel’s recommendations are finalized and reviewed by decision-makers in Washington, the next several months could prove to be a critical time in determining whether the procurement reform movement will live on or begin to wane.

Grkavac is an executive vice president of the Information Technology Association of America.

Acquisition panel recommendations

The Services Acquisition Reform Act mandated the creation of a high-level panel to review the government’s acquisition laws and regulations. Here are some of the Acquisition Advisory Panel’s recommendations so far.

  • The Office of Federal Procurement Policy should update the principles for agencies to apply in determining which functions civil servants must perform. Agencies must then ensure that those functions have an adequate number of employees.

  • To reduce artificial restrictions and maximize effective and efficient services, Congress should remove statutory prohibitions on personal services. Within the scope of those contracts, the government should be able to direct a contractor’s workers on the substance of the work and tasks performed. Prohibitions on government involvement in supervisory activities such as hiring, leave approvals, promotions or performance ratings should remain in place.

  • To be consistent with congressional action, OFPP should provide specific policy guidance that defines where, to what extent, under which circumstances and how agencies may procure personal services.

  • The Federal Acquisition Regulation Council should review existing rules and regulations to create uniform governmentwide policies and clauses that deal with organizational and personal conflicts of interest. The regulations should also address the protection of contractors’ confidential and proprietary data.

  • The goal should be ethical conduct by contractors, not technical compliance with a multitude of specific — and often confusing — rules and regulations. Therefore, the government should not impose rules and regulations in their entirety on contractors. Contractor employees will be working with civil servants daily, but the ethics rules for civil servants are not all self-evident. So agencies should consider requiring all contractor employees who operate in blended workforce environments to receive the same annual ethics training that civil servants do.

  • Agencies should use existing remedies, procedures and sanctions as much as possible against ethics violators. Those actions reinforce the standards of ethical conduct that apply to contractors, including company employees who work in a blended workforce. They also ensure that ethical contractors don’t have to compete with unethical organizations.

Source: Acquisition Advisory Panel
X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.