Editorial

Budget brownout

We hesitate to beat a dead horse—and we're grateful the third government shutdown has been averted—but we think putting off decisions is a poor way to manage the disagreement.

Congress has funded the high-visibility programs whose shutdown caused a public furor and left the others with enough money to pay staff and creep along—but not much else.

We realize this fight is a matter of principle for both sides. However, we continue to believe that holding government programs hostage until the fall election is the wrong way to settle the dispute.

Now we face the prospect of many critical government systems being financially starved. The delays will not be without cost. Systems in development may be jeopardized. Those already in place may lose upgrades. And procurements in process—some under way for a year or more—may be derailed because the technology has changed or the agencies do not have the funds to obligate. A few agencies are trying to cope by lowering the minimum purchasing levels dramatically to permit them to get a contract in place.

The whole approach flies in the face of the concept of good business practices that both sides are preaching. While Congress and the administration are arguing the philosophy of government, they should deal with the reality of it.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.