Panel mulls change in federal role

A panel of public and private experts in geospatial processing began meeting last month to consider whether civilian agencies should cut back on geographic information programs and services funded by the federal government which are estimated to cost tens of millions of dollars a year.

The group organized by the National Academy of Public Administration will consider whether some of the huge amount of geographic information that civilian agencies collect manage and create could be transferred to state and local governments outsourced or terminated. The group also will measure the importance of geospatial processing to the U.S. economy and its importance to keeping the nation competitive in a global economy.

"Advances in surveying mapping and other geographic information technologies the trend toward devolution of federal programs and activities toward state and local governments and the impact of U.S. budget deficits on economic growth over the past decade precipitate the need for a comprehensive examination&hellip of current geographic information functions and how these functions can be most effectively structured and performed " according to a NAPA document.

The study the results of which will be released by June is the first comprehensive research on the federal government's surveying mapping and geographic information systems (GIS) since the National Research Council conducted a similar study in 1981. "This is an appropriate time to look at all of the [GIS] activities " said Arnold Donahue project co-director at NAPA.

Four agencies - the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) the U.S. Forest Service the U.S. Geological Survey and the National Ocean Service - requested that an independent group undertake the study mostly because last session's Republican-controlled Congress had proposed large cuts in federal geographic information programs.

In its fiscal 1996 appropriations bill Congress initially proposed divesting the federal government's surveying and mapping activities but later agreed to allow agencies to study the cuts.

The study is a result of that action as well as Congress' overall interest in devolving federal activities to state and local governments said Dan Webb a BLM land surveyor based in Washington D.C.

Webb said the panel made up of nine geospatial experts from the private and public sectors universities associations and think tanks "will probably find some" geographic information programs to outsource or transfer to states.

Jack Dangermond president and chief executive officer of Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc. and a member of the panel said he will consider reducing some of the federal government's geographic information roles "if it makes sense."

But he added: "I'm pretty strong on the side of government in collecting and maintaining high-quality geographic data. We always talk about privatizing the collection of data but the long-term stewardship of managing data&hellip is government's role.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.