Desktop V: First-rate or frustrating?

I read with interest Mr. Frye's Op-Ed piece on Desktop V [FCW March 17]. In general I am very happy with the Desktop contracts particularly because of the great warranty coverage and software upgrades. However Desktop V has some aggravating flaws.

First my major bargaining tool payment to the vendor is removed from my hand. Someone else spot-checks orders which may or may not include mine. If his paperwork is in order (with or without an inventory) my computers ship and the vendor gets paid. When I inventory the shipment and discover several missing parts I'm left on my own to deal with the vendor. Under GSA or through direct buy I would not pay the vendor until I had received everything.

Second as to "SSG follows up to make sure the customer is satisfied with the product and vendor": After three orders I have never had someone from SSG do any follow-up with me and my office is down the block from their offices! Calls to the Desktop V contract monitors receive nice words and "We're working on that " but no action.

I'll repeat: I'm generally happy with Desktop IV and V the products have performed well and I consider them a good buy for my money. However all is not peaches and cream as Mr. Frye implies. The manpower and time I have expended trying to correct problems with 26 systems do not make Desktop V a "best value."

Lt. Col. Raymond J. TycAir ForceVia the Internet

Featured

  • Budget
    Stock photo ID: 134176955 By Richard Cavalleri

    House passes stopgap spending bill

    The current appropriations bills are set to expire on Oct. 1; the bill now goes to the Senate where it is expected to pass.

  • Defense
    concept image of radio communication (DARPA)

    What to look for in DOD's coming spectrum strategy

    Interoperability, integration and JADC2 are likely to figure into an updated electromagnetic spectrum strategy expected soon from the Department of Defense.

Stay Connected