Letters to the Editor

Clarifying the finer points In your article "Virus infects communications with Mir" [FCW Oct. 20] Jonathan Wheat senior anti-virus laboratory analyst at the National Computer Security Association said macro viruses take their names from the macro language first created by Microsoft Corp. for inclusion in its Office 95 product. The article continues "Once a document that contains a macro command is exposed to the virus the virus easily is spread to other parts of a user's system or transmitted to another user usually through e-mail attachments. With the release of Microsoft's Office 97 with the macro language these viruses have grown dramatically."

I would just like to clarify a few points on which I think there might be some confusion. Macro commands have been around nearly as long as computers and they simply indicate a large complex command or command sequence. Microsoft used a macro language in its Word product well before its Office 95 product but they by no means created the term.

Other computer programs such as Corel Corp.'s WordPerfect have macro command languages as well but I am not aware of these other languages being used to spread viruses.

The article said Apple-branded computers had been infected with the virus. In general Macintosh computers are very virus-resistant compared to the Microsoft Windows platform but Microsoft Office complicates the work of virus prevention by encapsulating the viruses in the document code. The casual reader might have concluded that Apple computers were particularly vulnerable to the virus when I suspect that Gateway 2000 Inc. Dell Computer Corp. and other brands were at least equally affected.

Wheat also might have mentioned that of the five to six new viruses that are created per day most affect only computers running Windows or DOS.

John WoodComputer RenaissanceRockford Ill.

Featured

  • FCW PERSPECTIVES
    sensor network (agsandrew/Shutterstock.com)

    Are agencies really ready for EIS?

    The telecom contract has the potential to reinvent IT infrastructure, but finding the bandwidth to take full advantage could prove difficult.

  • People
    Dave Powner, GAO

    Dave Powner audits the state of federal IT

    The GAO director of information technology issues is leaving government after 16 years. On his way out the door, Dave Powner details how far govtech has come in the past two decades and flags the most critical issues he sees facing federal IT leaders.

  • FCW Illustration.  Original Images: Shutterstock, Airbnb

    Should federal contracting be more like Airbnb?

    Steve Kelman believes a lighter touch and a bit more trust could transform today's compliance culture.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.