Telecom fee rankles cash-strapped agencies

ATLANTA— The General Services Administration and the Defense Department are at odds with AT&T and Sprint over a new 4.9 percent "universal service fee" that the companies have tacked onto FTS 2000 long-distance bills that will require agencies to pay millions of dollars more each month for telecommunications services.~At an FTS 2000 users conference last week, representatives from agencies that use the network complained that their budgets could not accommodate the large and unexpected increase in the price of long-distance services resulting from the additional charge. Others questioned the legality of vendors increasing prices on a fixed-price contract such as FTS 2000.~Officials from GSA's Federal Technology Service said last week they have collected the fees from agencies but will not pass them along to FTS 2000 contractors AT&T and Sprint until it is determined whether the charges are appropriate.~"We're going to collect the amount AT&T and Sprint have put on our bills and hold it until this dispute runs its course," said Mark Langsam, a regional economist in the FTS Office of Regional Services. "The question is whether they can pass that amount through to us as part of a firm, fixed-price contract arrangement or [whether] that [cost was] already included in the [previous] contract negotiations."~The Telecommunications Reform Act of 1996 allows vendors to charge universal service fees to help them meet requirements to provide advanced networking services to schools, libraries and rural areas.~The provision also has been controversial outside of the federal contracting arena as the carriers began applying the charge to their business customers.~Because the requirement for universal service was strongly endorsed by Vice President Al Gore, executive branch agencies are reluctant to criticize it. "It really puts the government in a bind," said Ron Hack, director of the Commerce Department's Office of Systems and Telecommunications Management. "On one hand, it's a dollars-and-cents issue that will cost an organization like the Defense Department millions— and it's not budgeted. On the other hand, this is a program that Vice President Gore is really behind. So it's a problem for the government to say, 'We don't like this.' "~A DOD spokeswoman said officials there have not yet taken a firm stance on the issue. ~Sources said it appears unlikely that the government will be able to force AT&T and Sprint to pay the charges themselves because a provision of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) allows vendors to charge users expenses they incur as a result of taxes imposed after a contract is awarded.~But Ida Ustad, GSA's deputy associate administrator for acquisition policy, said she and her counterparts at DOD have yet to rule on whether the fee can legally be considered a tax and be charged back to the government. If GSA and DOD rule against AT&T and Sprint, the vendors have the option of taking the case to the agencies' boards of contract appeals or to court, Ustad said.~She added that even if the agencies agree that the charges are legal, they may still need to resolve the issue of whether they are excessive.~Bob Petersen, a senior attorney at AT&T, said past decisions by the General Accounting Office, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals and the Court of Federal Claims support AT&T's position that the charge is appropriate. "There's a definition within the FAR of what an after-imposed tax is, and we think this [universal service charge] meets every criteria of that definition," Petersen said.~A Sprint spokesman said the company's attempt to pass the charge along to its federal customers is legitimate.


  • Comment
    customer experience (garagestock/

    Leveraging the TMF to improve customer experience

    Focusing on customer experience as part of the Technology Modernization Fund investment strategy will enable agencies to improve service and build trust in government.

  • FCW Perspectives
    zero trust network

    Why zero trust is having a moment

    Improved technologies and growing threats have agencies actively pursuing dynamic and context-driven security.

Stay Connected