Vendors bid brand names for Army PC-3

In a battle of brand names that echoes consumer PC advertising, at least five and possibly up to nine industry teams have submitted bids for the Army's Personal Computer-3 contract, valued in the $200 million to $300 million range and due for award early next year.

The Army Communications-Electronics Command Acquisition Center-Washington (CAC-W) kicked off the brand-name battle by telling prospective bidders that its "preferred solution" would include systems from "Tier One" manufacturers.

CAC-W, which acts as the acquisition agent for the Army Small Computer Program Office, Fort Monmouth, N.J., prefers not only brand names but "state-of-the-art platforms" and a "wide-open tech-insertion" clause to ensure that Army buyers will continue to receive state-of-the-art PCs throughout the three-year, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity, dual-award buy.

The Army recently completed testing of the computers offered by the PC-3 bidders at the Technology Integration Center, Fort Huachuca, Ariz. A CAC-W spokeswoman said she anticipates an award in February.

Eben Townes, vice president of Acquisition Solutions Inc., said he views the Army's preference for name-brand PCs as somewhat unusual, but it is in keeping with the new acquisition era that resulted from broad-scale procurement reform in the Defense Department. Townes said, "Today you can ask for anything you want...and I would suspect that with the volume [of the Army buy], only heavy hitters can play."

Alan Bechara, vice president and chief operating officer of Comark Federal Systems, estimated that the Army probably will buy 50,000 systems a year from the winning bidders, with those systems worth $80 million to $90 million a year. "That's not a bad piece of business," Bechara said, "even if you divide it by two."

Industry consultant Robert Guerra pegged the ultimate value of the PC-3 deal at slightly less than $150 million over the three-year ordering period, saying that based on his analysis of previous Army PC contracts "the [anticipated] volumes are not there."

Sources said potential bidders include Dell Computer Corp., bidding directly; IntelliSys Technology Corp., offering Compaq Computer Corp. PCs; Dunn/IDP Computer Corp., bidding Acer America Corp. desktops; Government Technology Services Inc., offering Hewlett-Packard Co. systems; and Comark and Vanstar Corp. both bidding IBM Corp. PCs. GTSI and Vanstar hold the Army PC-2 pact.


  • Comment
    customer experience (garagestock/

    Leveraging the TMF to improve customer experience

    Focusing on customer experience as part of the Technology Modernization Fund investment strategy will enable agencies to improve service and build trust in government.

  • FCW Perspectives
    zero trust network

    Why zero trust is having a moment

    Improved technologies and growing threats have agencies actively pursuing dynamic and context-driven security.

Stay Connected